TSTP Solution File: SET017-6 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SET017-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:07:46 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.79s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  23   ~;  19   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f184,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f113,f127,f183]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f182]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f179,f158]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ( ~ member(y,universal_class)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f155,f137]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ( ~ member(y,unordered_pair(x,x))
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f117,f130]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ( x = z
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f94,f112,f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X2,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
      | X0 = X2
      | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_member) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ( member(z,unordered_pair(x,y))
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> member(z,unordered_pair(x,y)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

fof(f94,axiom,
    y != z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_left_cancellation_3) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ~ member(y,unordered_pair(z,z)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f94,f94,f8]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    ( member(y,unordered_pair(x,x))
    | ~ member(y,universal_class)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f10,f131]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(x,y) = unordered_pair(x,x)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f92,f130]) ).

fof(f92,axiom,
    unordered_pair(x,y) = unordered_pair(x,z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_left_cancellation_1) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X1,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair3) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ( member(y,universal_class)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f133,f99]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X2),unordered_pair(X2,unordered_pair(X3,X3))),cross_product(X0,X1))
      | member(X2,X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f95]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f12,f12]) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',singleton_set) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ordered_pair) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X2,X0)
      | ~ member(ordered_pair(X2,X3),cross_product(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cartesian_product1) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ( member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(x,x))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f96,f130]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f93,f95]) ).

fof(f93,axiom,
    member(ordered_pair(y,z),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_left_cancellation_2) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f122,f106]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> member(z,universal_class) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    member(z,universal_class),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f96,f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X2),unordered_pair(X2,unordered_pair(X3,X3))),cross_product(X0,X1))
      | member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f15,f95]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X3,X1)
      | ~ member(ordered_pair(X2,X3),cross_product(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cartesian_product2) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f104,f110,f106]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( member(z,unordered_pair(x,y))
    | ~ member(z,universal_class) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f10,f92]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : SET017-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.16  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 13:25:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.37  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.16/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.78  % (16285)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.78  % (16286)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16292)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)Memory used [KB]: 1078
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78  % (16292)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78  % (16291)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.78  % (16293)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/55Mi)
% 0.61/0.78  % (16288)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (16290)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.79  % (16289)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-16283"
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.61/0.79  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.79  
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)Memory used [KB]: 1119
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.61/0.79  % (16293)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.61/0.79  % (16283)Success in time 0.424 s
% 0.61/0.79  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------