TSTP Solution File: SET013-2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET013-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:22:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.67s 1.84s
% Output   : Refutation 1.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET013-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 08:02:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.67/1.84  
% 1.67/1.84  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.67/1.84  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.67/1.84  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.67/1.84  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.67/1.84  SPASS derived 4667 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 4224 clauses.
% 1.67/1.84  SPASS allocated 70628 KBytes.
% 1.67/1.84  SPASS spent	0:00:01.38 on the problem.
% 1.67/1.84  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.67/1.84  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.67/1.84  		0:00:00.07 for inferences.
% 1.67/1.84  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.67/1.84  		0:00:01.23 for the reduction.
% 1.67/1.84  
% 1.67/1.84  
% 1.67/1.84  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 38 :
% 1.67/1.84  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.67/1.84  1[0:Inp] ||  -> equal_sets(intersection(as,bs),cs)*l.
% 1.67/1.84  2[0:Inp] ||  -> equal_sets(intersection(bs,as),ds)*l.
% 1.67/1.84  3[0:Inp] || equal_sets(cs,ds)*l -> .
% 1.67/1.84  5[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)*+ member(w,u)* -> member(w,v)*.
% 1.67/1.84  6[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(u,v) member(member_of_1_not_of_2(u,v),u)*.
% 1.67/1.84  7[0:Inp] || member(member_of_1_not_of_2(u,v),v)* -> subset(u,v).
% 1.67/1.84  13[0:Inp] || member(u,v) member(u,w) -> member(u,intersection(w,v))*.
% 1.67/1.84  14[0:Inp] || member(u,intersection(v,w))* -> member(u,v).
% 1.67/1.84  15[0:Inp] || member(u,intersection(v,w))* -> member(u,w).
% 1.67/1.84  17[0:Inp] || equal_sets(u,v) -> subset(v,u)*.
% 1.67/1.84  18[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)*+ subset(v,u)* -> equal_sets(u,v).
% 1.67/1.84  20[0:Inp] || equal_sets(u,v)* -> equal_sets(v,u).
% 1.67/1.84  26[0:Res:18.2,3.0] || subset(cs,ds)* subset(ds,cs) -> .
% 1.67/1.84  59[0:Res:17.1,5.0] || equal_sets(u,v)*+ member(w,v)* -> member(w,u)*.
% 1.67/1.84  164[0:Res:2.0,20.0] ||  -> equal_sets(ds,intersection(bs,as))*r.
% 1.67/1.84  165[0:Res:1.0,20.0] ||  -> equal_sets(cs,intersection(as,bs))*r.
% 1.67/1.84  245[0:Res:2.0,59.0] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,intersection(bs,as))*.
% 1.67/1.84  246[0:Res:1.0,59.0] || member(u,cs) -> member(u,intersection(as,bs))*.
% 1.67/1.84  250[0:Res:164.0,59.0] || member(u,intersection(bs,as))* -> member(u,ds).
% 1.67/1.84  251[0:Res:165.0,59.0] || member(u,intersection(as,bs))* -> member(u,cs).
% 1.67/1.84  267[0:Res:245.1,14.0] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,bs)*.
% 1.67/1.84  268[0:Res:245.1,15.0] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,as)*.
% 1.67/1.84  303[0:Res:246.1,14.0] || member(u,cs) -> member(u,as)*.
% 1.67/1.84  304[0:Res:246.1,15.0] || member(u,cs) -> member(u,bs)*.
% 1.67/1.84  326[0:Res:13.2,250.0] || member(u,as)* member(u,bs) -> member(u,ds).
% 1.67/1.84  333[0:Res:13.2,251.0] || member(u,bs) member(u,as)* -> member(u,cs).
% 1.67/1.84  5266[0:Res:303.1,326.0] || member(u,cs) member(u,bs)* -> member(u,ds).
% 1.67/1.84  5312[0:MRR:5266.1,304.1] || member(u,cs)* -> member(u,ds).
% 1.67/1.84  5313[0:Res:6.1,5312.0] ||  -> subset(cs,u) member(member_of_1_not_of_2(cs,u),ds)*.
% 1.67/1.84  5357[0:Res:5313.1,7.0] ||  -> subset(cs,ds)* subset(cs,ds)*.
% 1.67/1.84  5375[0:Obv:5357.0] ||  -> subset(cs,ds)*.
% 1.67/1.84  5376[0:MRR:26.0,5375.0] || subset(ds,cs)* -> .
% 1.67/1.84  5399[0:Res:268.1,333.1] || member(u,ds) member(u,bs)* -> member(u,cs).
% 1.67/1.84  5444[0:MRR:5399.1,267.1] || member(u,ds) -> member(u,cs)*.
% 1.67/1.84  5561[0:Res:5444.1,7.0] || member(member_of_1_not_of_2(u,cs),ds)* -> subset(u,cs).
% 1.67/1.84  5659[0:Res:6.1,5561.0] ||  -> subset(ds,cs)* subset(ds,cs)*.
% 1.67/1.84  5693[0:Obv:5659.0] ||  -> subset(ds,cs)*.
% 1.67/1.84  5694[0:MRR:5693.0,5376.0] ||  -> .
% 1.67/1.84  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.67/1.84  Formulae used in the proof : intersection_of_a_and_b_is_c intersection_of_b_and_a_is_d prove_c_equals_d membership_in_subsets subsets_axiom1 subsets_axiom2 member_of_both_is_member_of_intersection member_of_intersection_is_member_of_set1 member_of_intersection_is_member_of_set2 set_equal_sets_are_subsets2 subsets_are_set_equal_sets symmetry_for_set_equal
% 1.67/1.84  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------