TSTP Solution File: SET009+3 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SET009+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:07:36 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.71s
% Output : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 15 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 31 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f71,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f63,f33]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
~ member(sK3(difference(sK2,sK1),difference(sK2,sK0)),sK0),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8,f24,f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ subset(X0,X1)
| member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(X0,X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(X0,X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( member(X2,X0)
=> member(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).
fof(f24,plain,
~ member(sK3(difference(sK2,sK1),difference(sK2,sK0)),sK1),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f19,f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X2,difference(X0,X1))
| ~ member(X2,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( member(X2,difference(X0,X1))
<=> ( ~ member(X2,X1)
& member(X2,X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).
fof(f19,plain,
member(sK3(difference(sK2,sK1),difference(sK2,sK0)),difference(sK2,sK1)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f9,f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( member(sK3(X0,X1),X0)
| subset(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
~ subset(difference(sK2,sK1),difference(sK2,sK0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ subset(difference(X2,X1),difference(X2,X0))
& subset(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( subset(X0,X1)
=> subset(difference(X2,X1),difference(X2,X0)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( subset(X0,X1)
=> subset(difference(X2,X1),difference(X2,X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subset_difference) ).
fof(f8,plain,
subset(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
member(sK3(difference(sK2,sK1),difference(sK2,sK0)),sK0),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f23,f20,f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X2,difference(X0,X1))
| member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
~ member(sK3(difference(sK2,sK1),difference(sK2,sK0)),difference(sK2,sK0)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f9,f16]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ member(sK3(X0,X1),X1)
| subset(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
member(sK3(difference(sK2,sK1),difference(sK2,sK0)),sK2),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f19,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X2,difference(X0,X1))
| member(X2,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SET009+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 13:33:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.13/0.34 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.47/0.71 % (23820)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.47/0.71 % (23813)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.47/0.71 % (23814)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)First to succeed.
% 0.47/0.71 % (23820)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-23812"
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.47/0.71 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.47/0.71 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)------------------------------
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.47/0.71
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)Memory used [KB]: 978
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.47/0.71 % (23819)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.47/0.71 % (23812)Success in time 0.359 s
% 0.47/0.71 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------