TSTP Solution File: SET008+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SET008+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:56:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  29   ~;  24   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   4 sgn  35   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(equal_member_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
        <=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_member_defn) ).

fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(prove_intersection_difference_empty_set,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(difference(X1,X2),X2) = empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_intersection_difference_empty_set) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X6] : ~ member(X6,empty_set),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20] :
      ( ( ~ member(X17,X15)
        | member(X17,X16)
        | X15 != X16 )
      & ( ~ member(X18,X16)
        | member(X18,X15)
        | X15 != X16 )
      & ( ~ member(esk3_2(X19,X20),X19)
        | ~ member(esk3_2(X19,X20),X20)
        | X19 = X20 )
      & ( member(esk3_2(X19,X20),X19)
        | member(esk3_2(X19,X20),X20)
        | X19 = X20 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_member_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ( member(X9,X7)
        | ~ member(X9,intersection(X7,X8)) )
      & ( member(X9,X8)
        | ~ member(X9,intersection(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ member(X9,X7)
        | ~ member(X9,X8)
        | member(X9,intersection(X7,X8)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_defn])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( member(X14,X12)
        | ~ member(X14,difference(X12,X13)) )
      & ( ~ member(X14,X13)
        | ~ member(X14,difference(X12,X13)) )
      & ( ~ member(X14,X12)
        | member(X14,X13)
        | member(X14,difference(X12,X13)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( empty_set = X1
    | member(esk3_2(empty_set,X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : intersection(difference(X1,X2),X2) = empty_set,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_intersection_difference_empty_set]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( intersection(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | member(esk3_2(empty_set,intersection(X1,X2)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X10,X11] : intersection(X10,X11) = intersection(X11,X10),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0) != empty_set,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( intersection(difference(X1,X2),X3) = empty_set
    | ~ member(esk3_2(empty_set,intersection(difference(X1,X2),X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( intersection(X1,difference(X2,X3)) = empty_set
    | ~ member(esk3_2(empty_set,intersection(X1,difference(X2,X3))),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk2_0,difference(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    intersection(X1,difference(X2,X1)) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SET008+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 13:04:37 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # new_bool_3 with pid 8216 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.47  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8219 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.47  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.19/0.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.19/0.47  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.19/0.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.19/0.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.19/0.47  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 0.19/0.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.19/0.47  # ...subsumed                          : 10
% 0.19/0.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 38
% 0.19/0.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.19/0.47  # Generated clauses                    : 95
% 0.19/0.47  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 67
% 0.19/0.47  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Paramodulations                      : 93
% 0.19/0.47  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.19/0.47  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Total rewrite steps                  : 20
% 0.19/0.47  # ...of those cached                   : 12
% 0.19/0.47  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.19/0.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.19/0.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.19/0.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.19/0.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 18
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40
% 0.19/0.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 112
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.19/0.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 71
% 0.19/0.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 52
% 0.19/0.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.19/0.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.19/0.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
% 0.19/0.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.19/0.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1972
% 0.19/0.47  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 222
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.47  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.47  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.19/0.47  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------