TSTP Solution File: SET003-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SET003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:21:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(member_of_set2_is_member_of_union,axiom,
( member(X4,X3)
| ~ union(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v1q443yOmv/E---3.1_22483.p',member_of_set2_is_member_of_union) ).
cnf(subsets_axiom2,axiom,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v1q443yOmv/E---3.1_22483.p',subsets_axiom2) ).
cnf(a_union_a_is_aUa,hypothesis,
union(a,a,aUa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v1q443yOmv/E---3.1_22483.p',a_union_a_is_aUa) ).
cnf(prove_a_is_a_subset_of_aUa,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(a,aUa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v1q443yOmv/E---3.1_22483.p',prove_a_is_a_subset_of_aUa) ).
cnf(subsets_axiom1,axiom,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v1q443yOmv/E---3.1_22483.p',subsets_axiom1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( member(X4,X3)
| ~ union(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[member_of_set2_is_member_of_union]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subsets_axiom2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( member(X4,X3)
| ~ union(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X2) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
union(a,a,aUa),
a_union_a_is_aUa ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( member(X1,aUa)
| ~ member(X1,a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(a,aUa),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_a_is_a_subset_of_aUa]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( subset(X1,aUa)
| ~ member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,aUa),a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
subsets_axiom1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(a,aUa),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:33:21 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v1q443yOmv/E---3.1_22483.p
% 0.18/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22588 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22592 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.18/0.48 # Processed clauses : 26
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.18/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.18/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Paramodulations : 7
% 0.18/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.18/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 17
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.18/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20
% 0.18/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.18/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 548
% 0.18/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 35
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.18/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------