TSTP Solution File: SCT141+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SCT141+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 21:23:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.80s 85.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 1-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (  25 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_not__Cons__self,axiom,
    ! [X40,X6,X39] : X39 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X6),X40),X39),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_not__Cons__self) ).

fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
    ! [X13,X97,X16,X6,X33,X14] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X14,X33,X6),X16),X97),X13) = hAPP(hAPP(X16,X13),hAPP(X97,X13)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBS__1) ).

fof(help_c__COMBI__1,axiom,
    ! [X117,X6] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X6),X117) = X117,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBI__1) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43] : X43 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X42),X41),X43),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_not__Cons__self]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X98,X99,X100,X101,X102,X103] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X103,X102,X101),X100),X99),X98) = hAPP(hAPP(X100,X98),hAPP(X99,X98)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    X1 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X2),X3),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X118,X119] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X119),X118) = X118,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBI__1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),X8),X9) != hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    hAPP(c_COMBI(X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_COMBI(X8)),X9) != hAPP(X9,X9),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SCT141+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 01:44:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.42/23.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.47  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.47  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.48  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.48  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.48  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.52  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.71/69.49  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.71/69.49  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.71/69.49  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.71/69.52  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/85.97  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.80/85.97  
% 0.80/85.97  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.80/85.97  # OLD status Res
% 0.80/85.97  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.80/85.97  # Preprocessing time       : 0.042 s
% 0.80/85.97  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.80/85.97  
% 0.80/85.97  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.80/85.97  # OLD status Res
% 0.80/85.97  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.80/85.97  # Preprocessing time       : 0.040 s
% 0.80/85.97  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 0.80/85.97  
% 0.80/85.97  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.80/85.97  # OLD status Res
% 0.80/85.97  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 0.80/85.97  # Preprocessing time       : 0.061 s
% 0.80/85.97  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_33aa8a325940064c53b389b41203bb48a5cb5006 for 23 seconds:
% 0.80/85.97  # Preprocessing time       : 0.092 s
% 0.80/85.97  
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof found!
% 0.80/85.97  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.80/85.97  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object total steps             : 13
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object clause steps            : 7
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object formula steps           : 6
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object conjectures             : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.80/85.97  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.80/85.97  # Parsed axioms                        : 523
% 0.80/85.97  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Initial clauses                      : 847
% 0.80/85.97  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 48
% 0.80/85.97  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 799
% 0.80/85.97  # Processed clauses                    : 37638
% 0.80/85.97  # ...of these trivial                  : 1465
% 0.80/85.97  # ...subsumed                          : 24351
% 0.80/85.97  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11822
% 0.80/85.97  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 548
% 0.80/85.97  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 110460
% 0.80/85.97  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1285
% 0.80/85.97  # Backward-rewritten                   : 287
% 0.80/85.97  # Generated clauses                    : 529699
% 0.80/85.97  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 499834
% 0.80/85.97  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Paramodulations                      : 529032
% 0.80/85.97  # Factorizations                       : 18
% 0.80/85.97  # Equation resolutions                 : 652
% 0.80/85.97  # Current number of processed clauses  : 10180
% 0.80/85.97  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2123
% 0.80/85.97  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 12
% 0.80/85.97  #    Negative unit clauses             : 934
% 0.80/85.97  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7111
% 0.80/85.97  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 121758
% 0.80/85.97  # ...number of literals in the above   : 302251
% 0.80/85.97  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1573
% 0.80/85.97  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7910663
% 0.80/85.97  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6862984
% 0.80/85.97  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17961
% 0.80/85.97  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1945710
% 0.80/85.97  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 228
% 0.80/85.97  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 452880
% 0.80/85.97  # BW rewrite match successes           : 393
% 0.80/85.97  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.80/85.97  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 19037592
% 0.80/85.97  
% 0.80/85.97  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.80/85.97  # User time                : 15.507 s
% 0.80/85.97  # System time              : 0.163 s
% 0.80/85.97  # Total time               : 15.670 s
% 0.80/85.97  # Maximum resident set size: 172196 pages
% 0.80/92.51  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/92.51  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/92.52  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/92.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.80/92.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.80/92.57  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------