TSTP Solution File: SCT136+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SCT136+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:45:51 EDT 2024
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 26.58s 4.04s
% Output : CNFRefutation 26.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 1-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 25 sgn 25 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_not__Cons__self,axiom,
! [X27,X5,X28] : X28 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X5),X27),X28),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_not__Cons__self) ).
fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
! [X11,X104,X24,X5,X47,X29] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X29,X47,X5),X24),X104),X11) = hAPP(hAPP(X24,X11),hAPP(X104,X11)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBS__1) ).
fof(help_c__COMBI__1,axiom,
! [X115,X5] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X5),X115) = X115,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBI__1) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X27,X5,X28] : X28 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X5),X27),X28),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_not__Cons__self]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1010,X1011,X1012] : X1012 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1011),X1010),X1012),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1265,X1266,X1267,X1268,X1269,X1270] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1270,X1269,X1268),X1267),X1266),X1265) = hAPP(hAPP(X1267,X1265),hAPP(X1266,X1265)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
X1 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X2),X3),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1589,X1590] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X1590),X1589) = X1589,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBI__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),X8),X9) != hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBI(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_COMBI(X8)),X9) != hAPP(X9,X9),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.15 % Problem : SCT136+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.09/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.39 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % DateTime : Sun May 19 23:57:23 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/0.56 Running first-order model finding
% 0.25/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 26.58/4.04 # Version: 3.1.0
% 26.58/4.04 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 26.58/4.04 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # sh5l with pid 16296 completed with status 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Result found by sh5l
% 26.58/4.04 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 26.58/4.04 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 26.58/4.04 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 26.58/4.04 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with pid 16304 completed with status 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S
% 26.58/4.04 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 26.58/4.04 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 26.58/4.04 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 26.58/4.04 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 26.58/4.04 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 26.58/4.04 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 26.58/4.04 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 26.58/4.04
% 26.58/4.04 # Proof found!
% 26.58/4.04 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 26.58/4.04 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 26.58/4.04 # Parsed axioms : 523
% 26.58/4.04 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 34
% 26.58/4.04 # Initial clauses : 754
% 26.58/4.04 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 38
% 26.58/4.04 # Initial clauses in saturation : 716
% 26.58/4.04 # Processed clauses : 3640
% 26.58/4.04 # ...of these trivial : 251
% 26.58/4.04 # ...subsumed : 781
% 26.58/4.04 # ...remaining for further processing : 2608
% 26.58/4.04 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 86
% 26.58/4.04 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Backward-subsumed : 17
% 26.58/4.04 # Backward-rewritten : 56
% 26.58/4.04 # Generated clauses : 155606
% 26.58/4.04 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 153159
% 26.58/4.04 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 26.58/4.04 # Paramodulations : 155393
% 26.58/4.04 # Factorizations : 6
% 26.58/4.04 # NegExts : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Equation resolutions : 209
% 26.58/4.04 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Total rewrite steps : 4731
% 26.58/4.04 # ...of those cached : 3495
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional check models : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 26.58/4.04 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 26.58/4.04 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 26.58/4.04 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 26.58/4.04 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 26.58/4.04 # Current number of processed clauses : 1919
% 26.58/4.04 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 643
% 26.58/4.04 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 26.58/4.04 # Negative unit clauses : 167
% 26.58/4.04 # Non-unit-clauses : 1100
% 26.58/4.04 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 149719
% 26.58/4.04 # ...number of literals in the above : 195048
% 26.58/4.04 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Current number of archived clauses : 638
% 26.58/4.04 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 230014
% 26.58/4.04 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131058
% 26.58/4.04 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 379
% 26.58/4.04 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 106683
% 26.58/4.04 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 191
% 26.58/4.04 # BW rewrite match attempts : 83153
% 26.58/4.04 # BW rewrite match successes : 104
% 26.58/4.04 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Condensation successes : 0
% 26.58/4.04 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4371274
% 26.58/4.04 # Search garbage collected termcells : 12483
% 26.58/4.04
% 26.58/4.04 # -------------------------------------------------
% 26.58/4.04 # User time : 3.131 s
% 26.58/4.04 # System time : 0.131 s
% 26.58/4.04 # Total time : 3.262 s
% 26.58/4.04 # Maximum resident set size: 6048 pages
% 26.58/4.04
% 26.58/4.04 # -------------------------------------------------
% 26.58/4.04 # User time : 3.159 s
% 26.58/4.04 # System time : 0.135 s
% 26.58/4.04 # Total time : 3.294 s
% 26.58/4.04 # Maximum resident set size: 2564 pages
% 26.58/4.04 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------