TSTP Solution File: SCT027-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SCT027-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:44:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),X1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_linear__alt_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xlinear__alt__1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_linear__alt_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),X1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),X1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xlinear__alt__1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)),
cls_linear__alt_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),X1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SCT027-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 00:25:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.56 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 8033 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.20/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.56 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with pid 8047 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I
% 0.20/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.56 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 701
% 0.20/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Initial clauses : 701
% 0.20/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.20/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 698
% 0.20/0.56 # Processed clauses : 27
% 0.20/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.20/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.20/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.20/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.20/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 671
% 0.20/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 1666
% 0.20/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.20/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.20/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25541
% 0.20/0.56 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1358
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.56 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.56 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.56 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.20/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 3268 pages
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.56 # User time : 0.088 s
% 0.20/0.56 # System time : 0.022 s
% 0.20/0.56 # Total time : 0.110 s
% 0.20/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2280 pages
% 0.20/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------