TSTP Solution File: ROB021-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : ROB021-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:56:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.63s
% Output : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
( ~ equal(negate(u),negate(v))
| equal(u,v) ),
file('ROB021-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
~ equal(add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(a),negate(b)))),b),
file('ROB021-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
equal(add(u,v),add(v,u)),
file('ROB021-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,axiom,
equal(negate(add(negate(add(u,v)),negate(add(u,negate(v))))),u),
file('ROB021-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(66,plain,
( ~ equal(negate(u),v)
| equal(u,add(negate(add(v,w)),negate(add(v,negate(w))))) ),
inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,1]),
[iquote('0:SpL:5.0,1.0')] ).
cnf(816,plain,
equal(add(negate(add(negate(u),v)),negate(add(negate(u),negate(v)))),u),
inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[66]),
[iquote('0:EqR:66.0')] ).
cnf(854,plain,
equal(add(negate(add(negate(u),v)),negate(add(negate(v),negate(u)))),u),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,816]),
[iquote('0:SpR:3.0,816.0')] ).
cnf(967,plain,
equal(add(negate(add(u,negate(v))),negate(add(negate(u),negate(v)))),v),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,854]),
[iquote('0:SpR:3.0,854.0')] ).
cnf(986,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[967,2]),
[iquote('0:UnC:967.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ROB021-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 14:56:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.39/0.63
% 0.39/0.63 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.39/0.63 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.39/0.63 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.39/0.63 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.63 SPASS derived 685 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 203 clauses.
% 0.39/0.63 SPASS allocated 64364 KBytes.
% 0.39/0.63 SPASS spent 0:00:00.26 on the problem.
% 0.39/0.63 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.39/0.63 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.39/0.63 0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.39/0.63 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.39/0.63 0:00:00.20 for the reduction.
% 0.39/0.63
% 0.39/0.63
% 0.39/0.63 Here is a proof with depth 4, length 9 :
% 0.39/0.63 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.63 Formulae used in the proof : negative_equality_implies_positive_equality prove_huntingtons_axiom commutativity_of_add robbins_axiom
% 0.39/0.63
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------