TSTP Solution File: ROB021-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : ROB021-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 unknown
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1000MB
% OS : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/ROB/ROB021-1+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: peq
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 30 #f 6 3)
% (binary-unit 12 #f)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 12 #f)
% (binary-posweight-kb-big-order 60 #f 6 3)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 30 #f 6 3)
% (binary 30 #t)
% (binary-posweight-kb-big-order 156 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 102 #f)
% (binary-posweight-firstpref-order 60 #f)
% (binary-order 30 #f)
% (binary-posweight-kb-small-order 48 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 30 #f)
%
%
% **** EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED ****
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(6,40,0,12,0,1)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 8 [] equal(add(X,Y),add(Y,X)).
% 10 [] equal(negate(add(negate(add(X,Y)),negate(add(X,negate(Y))))),X).
% 11 [] -equal(negate(X),negate(Y)) | equal(X,Y).
% 12 [] -equal(add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(a),negate(b)))),b).
% 43 [para:8.1.1,10.1.1.1.1.1] equal(negate(add(negate(add(X,Y)),negate(add(Y,negate(X))))),Y).
% 80 [para:8.1.1,43.1.1.1.2.1] equal(negate(add(negate(add(X,Y)),negate(add(negate(X),Y)))),Y).
% 108 [hyper:11,80,slowcut:12] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 3
% clause depth limited to 6
% seconds given: 30
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 19
% derived clauses: 1002
% kept clauses: 93
% kept size sum: 1611
% kept mid-nuclei: 0
% kept new demods: 19
% forw unit-subs: 665
% forw double-subs: 0
% forw overdouble-subs: 0
% backward subs: 0
% fast unit cutoff: 0
% full unit cutoff: 0
% dbl unit cutoff: 0
% real runtime : 0.1
% process. runtime: 0.1
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 0
% length fails: 0
% strength fails: 0
% predlist fails: 0
% aux str. fails: 0
% by-lit fails: 0
% full subs tried: 0
% full subs fail: 0
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/ROB/ROB021-1+eq_r.in")
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------