TSTP Solution File: ROB021-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : ROB021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:55:06 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 107.73s 93.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 107.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  10 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   2   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (;  18   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ add > #nlpp > negate > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(negate,type,
    negate: $i > $i ).

tff(f_48,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( add(X,Y) = add(Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( negate(add(negate(add(X,Y)),negate(add(X,negate(Y))))) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( negate(X) != negate(Y) )
      | ( X = Y ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(a),negate(b)))) != b,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] : ( add(Y_2,X_1) = add(X_1,Y_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_219,plain,
    ! [X_20,Y_21] : ( negate(add(negate(add(X_20,Y_21)),negate(add(X_20,negate(Y_21))))) = X_20 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_1804,plain,
    ! [X_42,Y_43] : ( negate(add(negate(add(X_42,Y_43)),negate(add(Y_43,negate(X_42))))) = Y_43 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_219]) ).

tff(c_2511,plain,
    ! [X_50,X_51] : ( negate(add(negate(add(X_50,X_51)),negate(add(negate(X_50),X_51)))) = X_51 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_1804]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [Y_9,X_8] :
      ( ( Y_9 = X_8 )
      | ( negate(Y_9) != negate(X_8) ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_100700,plain,
    ! [X_50,X_8] : ( add(negate(add(X_50,negate(X_8))),negate(add(negate(X_50),negate(X_8)))) = X_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2511,c_8]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(a),negate(b)))) != b,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_100703,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_100700,c_10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem  : ROB021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 20:34:15 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 107.73/93.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 107.73/93.45  
% 107.73/93.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 107.79/93.48  
% 107.79/93.48  Inference rules
% 107.79/93.48  ----------------------
% 107.79/93.48  #Ref     : 5
% 107.79/93.48  #Sup     : 26033
% 107.79/93.48  #Fact    : 0
% 107.79/93.48  #Define  : 0
% 107.79/93.48  #Split   : 0
% 107.79/93.48  #Chain   : 0
% 107.79/93.48  #Close   : 0
% 107.79/93.48  
% 107.79/93.48  Ordering : KBO
% 107.79/93.48  
% 107.79/93.48  Simplification rules
% 107.79/93.48  ----------------------
% 107.79/93.48  #Subsume      : 2745
% 107.79/93.48  #Demod        : 35502
% 107.79/93.48  #Tautology    : 1067
% 107.79/93.48  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 107.79/93.48  #BackRed      : 1
% 107.79/93.48  
% 107.79/93.48  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 107.79/93.48  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 107.79/93.48  
% 107.79/93.48  Timing (in seconds)
% 107.79/93.48  ----------------------
% 107.79/93.48  Preprocessing        : 0.41
% 107.79/93.48  Parsing              : 0.21
% 107.79/93.48  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 107.79/93.48  Main loop            : 91.95
% 107.79/93.48  Inferencing          : 3.38
% 107.79/93.48  Reduction            : 84.67
% 107.79/93.48  Demodulation         : 83.77
% 107.79/93.48  BG Simplification    : 0.82
% 107.79/93.48  Subsumption          : 2.46
% 107.79/93.48  Abstraction          : 1.34
% 107.79/93.48  MUC search           : 0.00
% 107.79/93.48  Cooper               : 0.00
% 107.79/93.48  Total                : 92.40
% 107.79/93.48  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 107.79/93.48  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 107.79/93.48  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 107.79/93.48  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------