TSTP Solution File: ROB016-1 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : ROB016-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:49:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.06s 1.70s
% Output   : Refutation 3.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  17 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  18 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  166 (  10   ~;   8   |;   0   &; 148   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   7   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0   ^;  28   !;   0   ?;  28   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(negate_type,type,
    negate: $i > $i ).

thf(add_type,type,
    add: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(e_type,type,
    e: $i ).

thf(multiply_type,type,
    multiply: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(k_type,type,
    k: $i ).

thf(d_type,type,
    d: $i ).

thf(one_type,type,
    one: $i ).

thf(positive_integer_type,type,
    positive_integer: $i > $o ).

thf(successor_type,type,
    successor: $i > $i ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ( ( negate @ ( add @ d @ e ) )
    = ( negate @ e ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condition) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ( negate @ ( add @ d @ e ) )
    = ( negate @ e ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ one @ A )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',one_times_x) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ one @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( positive_integer @ A )
      | ( positive_integer @ ( successor @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',next_integer) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( positive_integer @ A )
      | ( positive_integer @ ( successor @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( negate @ ( add @ e @ ( multiply @ k @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ e ) ) ) ) ) ) )
   != ( negate @ e ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_result) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( negate @ ( add @ e @ ( multiply @ k @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ e ) ) ) ) ) ) )
   != ( negate @ e ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    positive_integer @ k,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_positive) ).

thf(31,plain,
    positive_integer @ k,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ ( add @ A @ B ) ) @ ( negate @ ( add @ A @ ( negate @ B ) ) ) ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',robbins_axiom) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ ( add @ A @ B ) ) @ ( negate @ ( add @ A @ ( negate @ B ) ) ) ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( add @ A @ B )
      = ( add @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( add @ A @ B )
      = ( add @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ A ) @ ( negate @ ( add @ B @ ( negate @ A ) ) ) ) )
       != B )
      | ~ ( positive_integer @ C )
      | ( ( negate @ ( add @ A @ ( multiply @ C @ ( add @ B @ ( negate @ ( add @ B @ ( negate @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) )
        = ( negate @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_3_6) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ A ) @ ( negate @ ( add @ B @ ( negate @ A ) ) ) ) )
       != B )
      | ~ ( positive_integer @ C )
      | ( ( negate @ ( add @ A @ ( multiply @ C @ ( add @ B @ ( negate @ ( add @ B @ ( negate @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) )
        = ( negate @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( add @ ( add @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( add @ A @ ( add @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_add) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( add @ ( add @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( add @ A @ ( add @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    positive_integer @ one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',one) ).

thf(26,plain,
    positive_integer @ one,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( positive_integer @ A )
      | ( ( multiply @ ( successor @ B ) @ A )
        = ( add @ A @ ( multiply @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',times_by_adding) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( positive_integer @ A )
      | ( ( multiply @ ( successor @ B ) @ A )
        = ( add @ A @ ( multiply @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[29,21,27,12,31,19,15,32,17,26,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ROB016-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May 18 23:46:58 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.91/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.22/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (129ms). 
% 1.22/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.73/1.23  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.73/1.23  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.73/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.85/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 10 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.85/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 10 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.85/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.85/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.85/1.32  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.06/1.70  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.06/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.06/1.70  % Time passed: 1155ms (effective reasoning time: 661ms)
% 3.06/1.70  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.06/1.70  % Axioms used in derivation (10): k_positive, one_times_x, next_integer, times_by_adding, condition, one, robbins_axiom, lemma_3_6, associativity_of_add, commutativity_of_add
% 3.06/1.70  % No. of inferences in proof: 23
% 3.06/1.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1155 ms resp. 661 ms w/o parsing
% 3.28/1.77  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.28/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------