TSTP Solution File: ROB015-2 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : ROB015-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:35:00 EST 2010

% Result   : Unknown 0.10s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29620/ROB/ROB015-2+eq_rstfp.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing 
% Error #2 : Illegal character for a predicate symbol in clause:
% $tptp_equal_2(X,X) [line 27]
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 0
% 	resolvents: 0	factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: nan
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% Total = 0
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% Average size of a generated clause: nan
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)0	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 0
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 0
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 0
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 0
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 0
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 0
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: nan
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: nan
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 0
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 0
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: nan
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.10 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------