TSTP Solution File: ROB014-2 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : ROB014-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:52:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : ROB014-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 15:29:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.40/0.58  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.40/0.58  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.40/0.58  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.40/0.58  # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.40/0.58  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.40/0.58  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.40/0.58  # Found 7 unit axioms.
% 0.40/0.58  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.40/0.58  # 4 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.40/0.58  # 7 unit axiom clauses
% 0.40/0.58  
% 0.40/0.58  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.40/0.58  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.40/0.59  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.40/0.59  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.59  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.59  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.40/0.59  
% 0.40/0.59  # End clausification derivation
% 0.40/0.59  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (positive_integer(one))).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_21, hypothesis, (negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e)))))=d)).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (multiply(one,X1)=X1)).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (add(add(X1,X2),X3)=add(X1,add(X2,X3)))).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (negate(add(negate(add(X1,X2)),negate(add(X1,negate(X2)))))=X1)).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (add(X1,X2)=add(X2,X1))).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))!=negate(e))).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (positive_integer(successor(X1))|~positive_integer(X1))).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (X1=X2|negate(add(X1,negate(add(X2,X3))))!=negate(add(X2,negate(add(X1,X3)))))).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (multiply(successor(X1),X2)=add(X2,multiply(X1,X2))|~positive_integer(X2))).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (negate(add(X1,negate(add(X2,multiply(X3,add(X1,negate(add(X1,negate(X2)))))))))=negate(add(X1,negate(X2)))|~positive_integer(X3))).
% 0.40/0.59  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.40/0.59  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.40/0.59  # Found 4 steps
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))!=negate(e)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))!=negate(e)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (negate(add(negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))),negate(add(negate(e),X8))))!=negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))),X8))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.40/0.59  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (negate(add(negate(add(negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))),negate(add(negate(e),X8)))),negate(add(negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))),X8)))),X7))))!=negate(add(negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))),X8)))),negate(add(negate(add(negate(add(e,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))),negate(add(negate(e),X8)))),X7))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_36, ...])).
% 0.40/0.59  # End printing tableau
% 0.40/0.59  # SZS output end
% 0.40/0.59  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.40/0.59  # Returning from population with 1 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.40/0.59  # We now have 1 tableaux to operate on
% 0.40/0.59  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.40/0.59  # Proof search is over...
% 0.40/0.59  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------