TSTP Solution File: ROB012-2 by iProver-SAT---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver-SAT---3.8
% Problem  : ROB012-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d SAT

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:08:33 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 79.81s 10.67s
% Output   : Model 79.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : ROB012-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d SAT
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:56:40 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running model finding
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --heuristic_context fnt --schedule fnt_schedule /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 79.81/10.67  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 79.81/10.67  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------  iProver source info
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 79.81/10.67  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 79.81/10.67  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 79.81/10.67  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Parsing...successful
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Problem Properties 
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  clauses                                 12
% 79.81/10.67  conjectures                             1
% 79.81/10.67  EPR                                     2
% 79.81/10.67  Horn                                    12
% 79.81/10.67  unary                                   10
% 79.81/10.67  binary                                  2
% 79.81/10.67  lits                                    14
% 79.81/10.67  lits eq                                 9
% 79.81/10.67  fd_pure                                 0
% 79.81/10.67  fd_pseudo                               0
% 79.81/10.67  fd_cond                                 0
% 79.81/10.67  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 79.81/10.67  AC symbols                              1
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Finite Models:
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ lit_activity_flag true
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 1
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 2
% 79.81/10.67  ------ 
% 79.81/10.67  Current options:
% 79.81/10.67  ------ 
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 2
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 2
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 2
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 2
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 2
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 3
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 3
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 3
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 3
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 3
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 4
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 4
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 4
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Trying domains of size >= : 4
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Proving...
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  ------ Building Model...Done
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  %------ The model is defined over ground terms (initial term algebra).
% 79.81/10.67  %------ Predicates are defined as (\forall x_1,..,x_n  ((~)P(x_1,..,x_n) <=> (\phi(x_1,..,x_n)))) 
% 79.81/10.67  %------ where \phi is a formula over the term algebra.
% 79.81/10.67  %------ If we have equality in the problem then it is also defined as a predicate above, 
% 79.81/10.67  %------ with "=" on the right-hand-side of the definition interpreted over the term algebra term_algebra_type
% 79.81/10.67  %------ See help for --sat_out_model for different model outputs.
% 79.81/10.67  %------ equality_sorted(X0,X1,X2) can be used in the place of usual "="
% 79.81/10.67  %------ where the first argument stands for the sort ($i in the unsorted case)
% 79.81/10.67  % SZS output start Model for theBenchmark.p
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  %------ Negative definition of equality_sorted 
% 79.81/10.67  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.67      (! [X0_12,X0_1,X1_1] : 
% 79.81/10.67        ( ~(equality_sorted(X0_12,X0_1,X1_1)) <=>
% 79.81/10.67             (
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0_12=$i & X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67             )
% 79.81/10.67        )
% 79.81/10.67      )
% 79.81/10.67     ).
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  %------ Negative definition of positive_integer 
% 79.81/10.67  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.67      (! [X0] : 
% 79.81/10.67        ( ~(positive_integer(X0)) <=>
% 79.81/10.67             (
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67             )
% 79.81/10.67        )
% 79.81/10.67      )
% 79.81/10.67     ).
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_negate 
% 79.81/10.67  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.67      (! [X0,X1] : 
% 79.81/10.67        ( iProver_Flat_negate(X0,X1) <=>
% 79.81/10.67             (
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67             )
% 79.81/10.67        )
% 79.81/10.67      )
% 79.81/10.67     ).
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_add 
% 79.81/10.67  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.67      (! [X0,X1,X2] : 
% 79.81/10.67        ( iProver_Flat_add(X0,X1,X2) <=>
% 79.81/10.67             (
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_4 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_4 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_4 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.67                 &
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.67                )
% 79.81/10.67  
% 79.81/10.67               | 
% 79.81/10.67                (
% 79.81/10.67                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_a 
% 79.81/10.68  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.68      (! [X0] : 
% 79.81/10.68        ( iProver_Flat_a(X0) <=>
% 79.81/10.68             (
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_b 
% 79.81/10.68  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.68      (! [X0] : 
% 79.81/10.68        ( iProver_Flat_b(X0) <=>
% 79.81/10.68             (
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_c 
% 79.81/10.68  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.68      (! [X0] : 
% 79.81/10.68        ( iProver_Flat_c(X0) <=>
% 79.81/10.68             (
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_k 
% 79.81/10.68  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.68      (! [X0] : 
% 79.81/10.68        ( iProver_Flat_k(X0) <=>
% 79.81/10.68             (
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_multiply 
% 79.81/10.68  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.68      (! [X0,X1,X2] : 
% 79.81/10.68        ( iProver_Flat_multiply(X0,X1,X2) <=>
% 79.81/10.68             (
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X2=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 | X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X2!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_successor 
% 79.81/10.68  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.68      (! [X0,X1] : 
% 79.81/10.68        ( iProver_Flat_successor(X0,X1) <=>
% 79.81/10.68             (
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                 &
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X1!=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_1 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_2 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_2 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68               | 
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_3 & X1=iProver_Domain_i_3 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  %------ Positive definition of iProver_Flat_one 
% 79.81/10.68  fof(lit_def,axiom,
% 79.81/10.68      (! [X0] : 
% 79.81/10.68        ( iProver_Flat_one(X0) <=>
% 79.81/10.68             (
% 79.81/10.68                (
% 79.81/10.68                  ( X0=iProver_Domain_i_4 )
% 79.81/10.68                )
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68             )
% 79.81/10.68        )
% 79.81/10.68      )
% 79.81/10.68     ).
% 79.81/10.68  % SZS output end Model for theBenchmark.p
% 79.81/10.68  ------                               Statistics
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ Problem properties
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  clauses:                                12
% 79.81/10.68  conjectures:                            1
% 79.81/10.68  epr:                                    2
% 79.81/10.68  horn:                                   12
% 79.81/10.68  ground:                                 5
% 79.81/10.68  unary:                                  10
% 79.81/10.68  binary:                                 2
% 79.81/10.68  lits:                                   14
% 79.81/10.68  lits_eq:                                9
% 79.81/10.68  fd_pure:                                0
% 79.81/10.68  fd_pseudo:                              0
% 79.81/10.68  fd_cond:                                0
% 79.81/10.68  fd_pseudo_cond:                         0
% 79.81/10.68  ac_symbols:                             1
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ General
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  abstr_ref_over_cycles:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  abstr_ref_under_cycles:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  gc_basic_clause_elim:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  num_of_symbols:                         147
% 79.81/10.68  num_of_terms:                           3307
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  parsing_time:                           0.
% 79.81/10.68  unif_index_cands_time:                  0.51
% 79.81/10.68  unif_index_add_time:                    0.136
% 79.81/10.68  orderings_time:                         0.
% 79.81/10.68  out_proof_time:                         0.
% 79.81/10.68  total_time:                             9.795
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ Preprocessing
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  num_of_splits:                          0
% 79.81/10.68  num_of_split_atoms:                     0
% 79.81/10.68  num_of_reused_defs:                     0
% 79.81/10.68  num_eq_ax_congr_red:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  num_of_sem_filtered_clauses:            1
% 79.81/10.68  num_of_subtypes:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  monotx_restored_types:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  sat_num_of_epr_types:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  sat_num_of_non_cyclic_types:            0
% 79.81/10.68  sat_guarded_non_collapsed_types:        0
% 79.81/10.68  num_pure_diseq_elim:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  simp_replaced_by:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  res_preprocessed:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_preprocessed:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  prep_upred:                             0
% 79.81/10.68  prep_unflattend:                        1
% 79.81/10.68  prep_well_definedness:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  smt_new_axioms:                         0
% 79.81/10.68  pred_elim_cands:                        1
% 79.81/10.68  pred_elim:                              0
% 79.81/10.68  pred_elim_cl:                           0
% 79.81/10.68  pred_elim_cycles:                       1
% 79.81/10.68  merged_defs:                            0
% 79.81/10.68  merged_defs_ncl:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  bin_hyper_res:                          0
% 79.81/10.68  prep_cycles:                            3
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  splitting_time:                         0.
% 79.81/10.68  sem_filter_time:                        0.001
% 79.81/10.68  monotx_time:                            0.
% 79.81/10.68  subtype_inf_time:                       0.
% 79.81/10.68  res_prep_time:                          0.008
% 79.81/10.68  sup_prep_time:                          0.
% 79.81/10.68  pred_elim_time:                         0.
% 79.81/10.68  bin_hyper_res_time:                     0.
% 79.81/10.68  prep_time_total:                        0.012
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ Propositional Solver
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  prop_solver_calls:                      522
% 79.81/10.68  prop_fast_solver_calls:                 231
% 79.81/10.68  smt_solver_calls:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  smt_fast_solver_calls:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  prop_num_of_clauses:                    86577
% 79.81/10.68  prop_preprocess_simplified:             262591
% 79.81/10.68  prop_fo_subsumed:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  prop_solver_time:                       0.185
% 79.81/10.68  prop_fast_solver_time:                  0.
% 79.81/10.68  prop_unsat_core_time:                   0.042
% 79.81/10.68  smt_solver_time:                        0.
% 79.81/10.68  smt_fast_solver_time:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ QBF
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  qbf_q_res:                              0
% 79.81/10.68  qbf_num_tautologies:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  qbf_prep_cycles:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ BMC1
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  bmc1_current_bound:                     -1
% 79.81/10.68  bmc1_last_solved_bound:                 -1
% 79.81/10.68  bmc1_unsat_core_size:                   -1
% 79.81/10.68  bmc1_unsat_core_parents_size:           -1
% 79.81/10.68  bmc1_merge_next_fun:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  bmc1_unsat_core_clauses_time:           0.
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ Instantiation
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_of_clauses:                    6662
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_in_passive:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_in_active:                     68935
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_of_loops:                      153414
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_in_unprocessed:                0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_of_learning_restarts:          11
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_moves_active_passive:          83902
% 79.81/10.68  inst_lit_activity:                      0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_lit_activity_moves:                0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_tautologies:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_prop_implied:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_existing_simplified:           0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_eq_res_simplified:             0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_child_elim:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_of_dismatching_blockings:      44891
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_of_non_proper_insts:           93117
% 79.81/10.68  inst_num_of_duplicates:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  inst_inst_num_from_inst_to_res:         0
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  inst_time_sim_new:                      2.844
% 79.81/10.68  inst_time_sim_given:                    0.01
% 79.81/10.68  inst_time_dismatching_checking:         0.451
% 79.81/10.68  inst_time_total:                        9.537
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ Resolution
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  res_num_of_clauses:                     19
% 79.81/10.68  res_num_in_passive:                     0
% 79.81/10.68  res_num_in_active:                      0
% 79.81/10.68  res_num_of_loops:                       54
% 79.81/10.68  res_forward_subset_subsumed:            2580
% 79.81/10.68  res_backward_subset_subsumed:           0
% 79.81/10.68  res_forward_subsumed:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  res_backward_subsumed:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  res_forward_subsumption_resolution:     0
% 79.81/10.68  res_backward_subsumption_resolution:    0
% 79.81/10.68  res_clause_to_clause_subsumption:       126
% 79.81/10.68  res_subs_bck_cnt:                       1
% 79.81/10.68  res_orphan_elimination:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  res_tautology_del:                      56
% 79.81/10.68  res_num_eq_res_simplified:              0
% 79.81/10.68  res_num_sel_changes:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  res_moves_from_active_to_pass:          0
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  res_time_sim_new:                       0.
% 79.81/10.68  res_time_sim_fw_given:                  0.001
% 79.81/10.68  res_time_sim_bw_given:                  0.
% 79.81/10.68  res_time_total:                         0.005
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ Superposition
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  sup_num_of_clauses:                     undef
% 79.81/10.68  sup_num_in_active:                      undef
% 79.81/10.68  sup_num_in_passive:                     undef
% 79.81/10.68  sup_num_of_loops:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_fw_superposition:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_bw_superposition:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_eq_factoring:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_eq_resolution:                      0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_immediate_simplified:               0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_given_eliminated:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  comparisons_done:                       72
% 79.81/10.68  comparisons_avoided:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  comparisons_inc_criteria:               0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_deep_cl_discarded:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_num_of_deepenings:                  0
% 79.81/10.68  sup_num_of_restarts:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_generating:                    0.
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_sim_fw_full:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_sim_bw_full:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_sim_fw_immed:                  0.
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_sim_bw_immed:                  0.
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_prep_sim_fw_input:             0.
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_prep_sim_bw_input:             0.
% 79.81/10.68  sup_time_total:                         0.
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  ------ Simplifications
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  sim_repeated:                           0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_fw_subset_subsumed:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_bw_subset_subsumed:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_fw_subsumed:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_bw_subsumed:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_fw_subsumption_res:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_bw_subsumption_res:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_fw_unit_subs:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_bw_unit_subs:                       0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_tautology_del:                      0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_eq_tautology_del:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_eq_res_simp:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_fw_demodulated:                     0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_bw_demodulated:                     0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_encompassment_demod:                0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_light_normalised:                   0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_ac_normalised:                      1
% 79.81/10.68  sim_joinable_taut:                      0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_joinable_simp:                      0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_fw_ac_demod:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_bw_ac_demod:                        0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_smt_subsumption:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_smt_simplified:                     0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_ground_joinable:                    0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_bw_ground_joinable:                 0
% 79.81/10.68  sim_connectedness:                      0
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_subset_subs:                0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_bw_subset_subs:                0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_subs:                       0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_bw_subs:                       0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_subs_res:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_bw_subs_res:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_unit_subs:                  0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_bw_unit_subs:                  0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_tautology_del:                 0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_eq_tautology_del:              0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_eq_res_simp:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_demod:                      0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_bw_demod:                      0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_light_norm:                    0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_joinable:                      0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_ac_norm:                       0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_ac_demod:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_bw_ac_demod:                   0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_smt_subs:                      0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_gjoin:                      0.
% 79.81/10.68  sim_time_fw_connected:                  0.
% 79.81/10.68  
% 79.81/10.68  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------