TSTP Solution File: ROB010-1 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : ROB010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:53:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 17.65s 2.56s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : ROB010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.10/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.28 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 15:14:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 17.65/2.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 17.65/2.56 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 17.65/2.56 a != negate(add(c,negate(add(b,a))))).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c1, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 a != negate(add(c,negate(add(b,a)))),
% 17.65/2.56 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 17.65/2.56 add(X0,X1) = add(X1,X0)).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 add(b,a) = add(X1,X0)).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c3, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c4, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c5, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 X2 != add(X0,X1) | a != negate(add(c,negate(X2))),
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 X2 = add(X0,X1)).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c6, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 a != negate(add(c,negate(X2))),
% 17.65/2.56 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a1])], [c5])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c7, axiom,
% 17.65/2.56 negate(add(negate(add(X3,X4)),negate(add(X3,negate(X4))))) = X3).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 negate(X5) = negate(add(c,negate(X2)))).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c8, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(lazy_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c6, c7])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c9, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(lazy_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c6, c7])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c10, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 X5 != add(negate(add(X3,X4)),negate(add(X3,negate(X4)))) | X6 != X3 | a != X6,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(lazy_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c6, c7])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c11, axiom,
% 17.65/2.56 negate(add(a,negate(b))) = c).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 negate(add(X3,negate(X4))) = negate(add(a,negate(b)))).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c12, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 X6 != X3 | a != X6,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c13, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c14, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 X7 != c | X5 != add(negate(add(X3,X4)),X7),
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 X7 = c).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c15, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 X5 != add(negate(add(X3,X4)),X7),
% 17.65/2.56 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c14])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c16, axiom,
% 17.65/2.56 add(X8,X9) = add(X9,X8)).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 add(negate(add(X3,X4)),X7) = add(X8,X9)).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c17, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c18, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c19, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 X10 != add(X9,X8) | X5 != X10,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 X10 = add(X9,X8)).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c20, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 X5 != X10,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a6])], [c19])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 X5 = X10).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c21, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a7])], [c20])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a8, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 X6 = X3).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c22, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 a != X6,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a8])], [c12])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(a9, assumption,
% 17.65/2.56 a = X6).
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c23, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c22])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 cnf(c24, plain,
% 17.65/2.56 $false,
% 17.65/2.56 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X0, a),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X1, b),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X2, add(X0,X1)),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X3, a),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X4, b),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X6, a),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X5, add(c,negate(X2))),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X7, c),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X8, negate(add(X3,X4))),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X9, c),
% 17.65/2.56 bind(X10, add(X9,X8))
% 17.65/2.56 ],
% 17.65/2.56 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9])).
% 17.65/2.56
% 17.65/2.56 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------