TSTP Solution File: ROB008-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : ROB008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2RSk4V6z5f true

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:09:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 27.87s 4.61s
% Output   : Refutation 27.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : ROB008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2RSk4V6z5f true
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 07:30:04 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.83/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.83/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.83/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.83/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.83/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 27.87/4.61  % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 27.87/4.61  % done 214 iterations in 3.820s
% 27.87/4.61  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 27.87/4.61  % SZS output start Refutation
% 27.87/4.61  thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(condition, axiom,
% 27.87/4.61    (( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ ( add @ b @ c ) ) ) ) =
% 27.87/4.61     ( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( add @ b @ ( negate @ c ) ) ) ))).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ c))))
% 27.87/4.61         = (negate @ (add @ a @ (add @ b @ (negate @ c)))))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condition])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(commutativity_of_add, axiom, (( add @ X @ Y ) = ( add @ Y @ X ))).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ c @ b))))
% 27.87/4.61         = (negate @ (add @ a @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ b))))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 27.87/4.61                [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(associativity_of_add, axiom,
% 27.87/4.61    (( add @ ( add @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) = ( add @ X @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((add @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) = (add @ X1 @ (add @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl119, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ c @ b))))
% 27.87/4.61         = (negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (add @ a @ b))))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl118, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 27.87/4.61    (( negate @
% 27.87/4.61       ( add @
% 27.87/4.61         ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @ 
% 27.87/4.61         ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 27.87/4.61     ( X ))).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((negate @ 
% 27.87/4.61           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @ 
% 27.87/4.61            (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 27.87/4.61           = (X0))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl412, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((negate @ 
% 27.87/4.61           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 27.87/4.61            (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 27.87/4.61           = (X0))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl1242, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((negate @ 
% 27.87/4.61           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1))) @ 
% 27.87/4.61            (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0))))
% 27.87/4.61           = (X0))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl412])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl5158, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (((negate @ 
% 27.87/4.61         (add @ (negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (add @ a @ b))) @ 
% 27.87/4.61          (negate @ (add @ (add @ c @ b) @ a))))
% 27.87/4.61         = (a))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl119, zip_derived_cl1242])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((negate @ 
% 27.87/4.61           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @ 
% 27.87/4.61            (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 27.87/4.61           = (X0))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl402, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((negate @ 
% 27.87/4.61           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @ 
% 27.87/4.61            (negate @ (add @ (negate @ X1) @ X0))))
% 27.87/4.61           = (X0))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl1186, plain,
% 27.87/4.61      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 27.87/4.61         ((negate @ 
% 27.87/4.61           (add @ (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 27.87/4.61            (negate @ (add @ (negate @ X1) @ X0))))
% 27.87/4.61           = (X0))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl402])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl5225, plain, (((add @ a @ b) = (a))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 27.87/4.61                [zip_derived_cl5158, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0, 
% 27.87/4.61                 zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1186])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(prove_result, conjecture, (( add @ a @ b ) = ( a ))).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( add @ a @ b ) != ( a )),
% 27.87/4.61    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_result])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (((add @ a @ b) != (a))),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 27.87/4.61  thf(zip_derived_cl5226, plain, ($false),
% 27.87/4.61      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 27.87/4.61                [zip_derived_cl5225, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 27.87/4.61  
% 27.87/4.61  % SZS output end Refutation
% 27.87/4.61  
% 27.87/4.61  
% 27.87/4.61  % Terminating...
% 28.62/4.73  % Runner terminated.
% 28.62/4.74  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------