TSTP Solution File: ROB002-1 by Toma---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : ROB002-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:08:59 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.94s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : ROB002-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 07:32:34 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.94/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.94/1.26  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.94/1.26  original problem:
% 0.94/1.26  axioms:
% 0.94/1.26  add(X, Y) = add(Y, X)
% 0.94/1.26  add(add(X, Y), Z) = add(X, add(Y, Z))
% 0.94/1.26  negate(add(negate(add(X, Y)), negate(add(X, negate(Y))))) = X
% 0.94/1.26  negate(negate(X)) = X
% 0.94/1.26  goal:
% 0.94/1.26  add(negate(add(a(), negate(b()))), negate(add(negate(a()), negate(b())))) != b()
% 0.94/1.26  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.94/1.26  it suffices to show that add(negate(add(a(), negate(b()))), negate(add(negate(a()), negate(b())))) = b() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.94/1.26  Here is an equational proof:
% 0.94/1.26  0: add(X0, X1) = add(X1, X0).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  1: add(add(X0, X1), X2) = add(X0, add(X1, X2)).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  2: negate(add(negate(add(X0, X1)), negate(add(X0, negate(X1))))) = X0.
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  3: negate(negate(X0)) = X0.
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  5: add(X3, add(X4, X2)) = add(add(X4, X3), X2).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: A critical pair between equations 1 and 0.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  8: add(negate(add(X2, X3)), negate(add(X2, negate(X3)))) = negate(X2).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: A critical pair between equations 3 and 2.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  10: add(X3, X4) = negate(add(negate(add(add(X3, X4), X1)), negate(add(X3, add(X4, negate(X1)))))).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: A critical pair between equations 2 and 1.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  11: add(X3, X4) = negate(add(negate(add(X3, add(X4, X5))), negate(add(add(X3, X4), negate(X5))))).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: A critical pair between equations 2 and 1.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  15: add(X3, X4) = negate(add(negate(add(X3, add(X4, X5))), negate(add(X4, add(X3, negate(X5)))))).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: Rewrite equation 11,
% 0.94/1.26                 lhs with equations []
% 0.94/1.26                 rhs with equations [5].
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  16: add(X3, X4) = add(X4, X3).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: Rewrite equation 10,
% 0.94/1.26                 lhs with equations []
% 0.94/1.26                 rhs with equations [5,15].
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  24: negate(X5) = add(negate(add(X6, X5)), negate(add(X5, negate(X6)))).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: A critical pair between equations 8 and 16.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  39: negate(X7) = add(negate(add(X6, X7)), negate(add(negate(X6), X7))).
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: A critical pair between equations 24 and 0.
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  49: add(negate(add(a(), negate(b()))), negate(add(negate(a()), negate(b())))) = b().
% 0.94/1.26  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [39,3]
% 0.94/1.26                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.94/1.26  
% 0.94/1.26  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------