TSTP Solution File: RNG124+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : RNG124+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:37:15 EDT 2024
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 15 ~; 6 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__2673,hypothesis,
xr != sz00,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2673) ).
fof(m__2273,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xu,xI)
& xu != sz00
& ! [X1] :
( ( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& X1 != sz00 )
=> ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(X1),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2273) ).
fof(m__2666,hypothesis,
( aElement0(xq)
& aElement0(xr)
& xb = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xq,xu),xr)
& ( xr = sz00
| iLess0(sbrdtbr0(xr),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2666) ).
fof(m__2729,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xr,xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2729) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
xr != sz00,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__2673]) ).
fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xu,xI)
& xu != sz00
& ! [X1] :
( ( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& X1 != sz00 )
=> ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(X1),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__2273]) ).
fof(c_0_6,hypothesis,
xr != sz00,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,hypothesis,
! [X117] :
( aElementOf0(xu,xI)
& xu != sz00
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X117,xI)
| X117 = sz00
| ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(X117),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( xr = sz00
| iLess0(sbrdtbr0(xr),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2666]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
xr != sz00,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( X1 = sz00
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(X1),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
iLess0(sbrdtbr0(xr),sbrdtbr0(xu)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xr,xI),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2729]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : RNG124+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat May 18 12:24:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 10438 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHSF-FSMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 10445 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHSF-FSMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 56
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 124
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 119
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 208
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 205
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 57
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 43
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 16
% 0.19/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 58
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of those cached : 45
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 70
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 29
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 282
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 121
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1590
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 385
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 208
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10787
% 0.19/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1913
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 2056 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.023 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.067 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------