TSTP Solution File: RNG123+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG123+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:25:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.43s 2.11s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 5 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_210,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(smndt0(sdtasdt0(xq,xu)),xb) = xr,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knpm4uke/lgb.p',i_0_210) ).
cnf(i_0_203,hypothesis,
smndt0(sdtasdt0(xq,xu)) = sdtpldt0(esk42_0,esk43_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knpm4uke/lgb.p',i_0_203) ).
cnf(i_0_202,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(smndt0(sdtasdt0(xq,xu)),xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knpm4uke/lgb.p',i_0_202) ).
cnf(i_0_148,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xI) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knpm4uke/lgb.p',i_0_148) ).
cnf(i_0_206,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xb,xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knpm4uke/lgb.p',i_0_206) ).
cnf(i_0_211,negated_conjecture,
~ aElementOf0(xr,xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knpm4uke/lgb.p',i_0_211) ).
cnf(c_0_218,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(smndt0(sdtasdt0(xq,xu)),xb) = xr,
i_0_210 ).
cnf(c_0_219,hypothesis,
smndt0(sdtasdt0(xq,xu)) = sdtpldt0(esk42_0,esk43_0),
i_0_203 ).
cnf(c_0_220,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(smndt0(sdtasdt0(xq,xu)),xI),
i_0_202 ).
cnf(c_0_221,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xI) ),
i_0_148 ).
cnf(c_0_222,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(esk42_0,esk43_0),xb) = xr,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_218,c_0_219]) ).
cnf(c_0_223,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xb,xI),
i_0_206 ).
cnf(c_0_224,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(esk42_0,esk43_0),xI),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_220,c_0_219]) ).
cnf(c_0_225,negated_conjecture,
~ aElementOf0(xr,xI),
i_0_211 ).
cnf(c_0_226,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_221,c_0_222]),c_0_223]),c_0_224])]),c_0_225]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : RNG123+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 30 11:35:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 6.43/2.11 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.43/2.11 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.43/2.11 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.43/2.11 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 6.43/2.11 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 6.43/2.11 #
% 6.43/2.11 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 6.43/2.11
% 6.43/2.11 # Proof found!
% 6.43/2.11 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.43/2.11 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.43/2.11 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.43/2.11
% 6.43/2.11 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.43/2.11 # User time : 0.025 s
% 6.43/2.11 # System time : 0.005 s
% 6.43/2.11 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 6.43/2.11 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.43/2.11
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------