TSTP Solution File: RNG112+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : RNG112+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:41:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  12 unt;   3 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   0 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(18,axiom,
    ~ equal(sz00,skc37),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ~ equal(sz00,skc38),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ~ equal(skf18(u),sz00),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    equal(sdtpldt1(slsdtgt0(xa),slsdtgt0(xb)),xI),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    aElementOf0(skc37,sdtpldt1(slsdtgt0(xa),slsdtgt0(xb))),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(u,xI)
    | equal(u,sz00)
    | aElementOf0(skc38,xI) ),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(u,xI)
    | equal(u,sz00)
    | aElementOf0(skf18(u),xI) ),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(u,xI)
    | equal(u,sz00)
    | iLess0(sbrdtbr0(skf18(u)),sbrdtbr0(u)) ),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(u,xI)
    | ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(u),sbrdtbr0(skc38))
    | equal(u,sz00) ),
    file('RNG112+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(105,plain,
    aElementOf0(skc37,xI),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[25,26]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:25.0,26.0')] ).

cnf(119,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(skc38,xI)
    | aElementOf0(skf18(skc38),xI) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51,19]),
    [iquote('0:Res:51.2,19.0')] ).

cnf(124,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(skc38,xI)
    | iLess0(sbrdtbr0(skf18(skc38)),sbrdtbr0(skc38)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[56,19]),
    [iquote('0:Res:56.2,19.0')] ).

cnf(135,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(u,xI)
    | equal(u,sz00) ),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[50]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:50.0,50.1')] ).

cnf(136,plain,
    equal(sz00,skc37),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[105,135]),
    [iquote('1:Res:105.0,135.0')] ).

cnf(137,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[136,18]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:136.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(138,plain,
    aElementOf0(skc38,xI),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[50]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:137.0,50.2')] ).

cnf(139,plain,
    aElementOf0(skf18(skc38),xI),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[119,138]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:119.0,138.0')] ).

cnf(140,plain,
    iLess0(sbrdtbr0(skf18(skc38)),sbrdtbr0(skc38)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[124,138]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:124.0,138.0')] ).

cnf(207,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(skf18(skc38),xI)
    | equal(skf18(skc38),sz00) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[140,61]),
    [iquote('1:Res:140.0,61.1')] ).

cnf(209,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[207,139,20]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:207.0,207.1,139.0,20.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09  % Problem  : RNG112+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.10  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime : Mon May 30 09:39:42 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.14/0.46  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.14/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.46  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.14/0.46  SPASS derived 71 clauses, backtracked 4 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 135 clauses.
% 0.14/0.46  SPASS allocated 99551 KBytes.
% 0.14/0.46  SPASS spent	0:00:00.16 on the problem.
% 0.14/0.46  		0:00:00.02 for the input.
% 0.14/0.46  		0:00:00.11 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.14/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.14/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.14/0.46  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 20 :
% 0.14/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.46  Formulae used in the proof : m__2228 m__2351 m__ m__2174
% 0.14/0.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------