TSTP Solution File: RNG109+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : RNG109+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.74s 3.93s
% Output   : Refutation 3.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (  14 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ aElement0(X)
    | sdtpldt0(X,sz00) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mAddZero) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ aElement0(X)
    | X = sdtpldt0(sz00,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mAddZero) ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ aSet0(X)
    | ~ aSet0(Y)
    | Z != sdtpldt1(X,Y)
    | aElementOf0(U,Z)
    | ~ aElementOf0(V,X)
    | ~ aElementOf0(W,Y)
    | sdtpldt0(V,W) != U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSSum) ).

cnf(80,axiom,
    ( ~ aElement0(X)
    | Y != slsdtgt0(X)
    | aSet0(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefPrIdeal) ).

cnf(88,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2091) ).

cnf(89,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xb),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2091) ).

cnf(90,hypothesis,
    ( xa != sz00
    | xb != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2110) ).

cnf(93,hypothesis,
    xI = sdtpldt1(slsdtgt0(xa),slsdtgt0(xb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2174) ).

cnf(94,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sz00,slsdtgt0(xa)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2203) ).

cnf(95,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xa,slsdtgt0(xa)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2203) ).

cnf(96,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sz00,slsdtgt0(xb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2203) ).

cnf(97,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xb,slsdtgt0(xb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2203) ).

cnf(98,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X,sdtpldt1(slsdtgt0(xa),slsdtgt0(xb)))
    | X = sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

cnf(99,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X,xI)
    | X = sz00 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[98,93,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(111,plain,
    sdtpldt0(xa,sz00) = xa,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,88]) ).

cnf(114,plain,
    xb = sdtpldt0(sz00,xb),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,89]) ).

cnf(152,plain,
    aSet0(slsdtgt0(xb)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[80,89,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(153,plain,
    aSet0(slsdtgt0(xa)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[80,88,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7220,plain,
    aElementOf0(xb,xI),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,153,152,93,94,97,theory(equality)]),114,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7221,plain,
    aElementOf0(xa,xI),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,153,152,93,95,96,theory(equality)]),111,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7893,plain,
    xb = sz00,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[99,7220]) ).

cnf(7894,plain,
    xa != sz00,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[90,7893,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7953,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[99,7894]),7221]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : RNG109+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon May 30 10:09:16 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  "."
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T10:09:16
% 0.21/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-05-30T10:09:16
% 0.21/0.51  WARNING:
% 0.21/0.51     |aNaturalNumber0| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.51  WARNING:
% 0.21/0.51     |iLess0| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 3.74/3.93  
% 3.74/3.93  
% 3.74/3.93  #||
% 3.74/3.93  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.74/3.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.74/3.93  ||#
% 3.74/3.93  
% 3.74/3.93  ; Summary of computation:
% 3.74/3.93  ;     17986 formulas have been input or derived (from 121 formulas).
% 3.74/3.93  ;      7953 (44%) were retained.  Of these,
% 3.74/3.93  ;         4909 (62%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 3.74/3.93  ;         3044 (38%) are still being kept.
% 3.74/3.93  ; 
% 3.74/3.93  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.011   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.004   0%   Assert                       (44 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.706  20%   Process new row              (17,878 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.906  26%   Resolution                   (240 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (120 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.010   0%   Condensing                   (10,114 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.943  27%   Forward subsumption          (10,114 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.163   5%   Backward subsumption         (5,670 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.018   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (18,968 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.269   8%   Forward simplification       (17,817 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.312   9%   Backward simplification      (7,952 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.021   1%   Ordering                     (13,865 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     0.079   2%   Other
% 3.74/3.93  ;     3.444        Total
% 3.74/3.93  ;     3.445        Real time
% 3.74/3.93  ; 
% 3.74/3.93  ; Term-hash-array has 13,828 terms in all.
% 3.74/3.93  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,186 entries (5,651 at peak, 5,670 added, 3,484 deleted).
% 3.74/3.93  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 7,514 nodes (10,010 at peak, 10,261 added, 2,747 deleted).
% 3.74/3.93  ;  Retrieved 54,425 possibly forward subsuming rows in 10,114 calls.
% 3.74/3.93  ;  Retrieved 27,934 possibly backward subsumed rows in 5,670 calls.
% 3.74/3.93  ; Path-index has 5,460 entries (13,272 at peak, 14,073 added, 8,613 deleted).
% 3.74/3.93  ; Path-index has 1,819 nodes (2,112 at peak, 2,194 added, 375 deleted).
% 3.74/3.93  ; Trie-index has 5,460 entries (13,272 at peak, 14,073 added, 8,613 deleted).
% 3.74/3.93  ; Trie-index has 16,526 nodes (39,575 at peak, 42,450 added, 25,924 deleted).
% 3.74/3.93  ; Retrieved 18,622 generalization terms in 69,150 calls.
% 3.74/3.93  ; Retrieved 2,281 instance terms in 2,281 calls.
% 3.74/3.93  ; Retrieved 2,604,672 unifiable terms in 38,558 calls.
% 3.74/3.93  ; 
% 3.74/3.93  ; The agenda of rows to process has 22 entries:
% 3.74/3.93  ;     6 with value 7               4 with value 10               1 with value 18
% 3.74/3.93  ;     4 with value 8               3 with value 16               2 with value 21
% 3.74/3.93  ;     2 with value 9
% 3.74/3.93  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 2 entries:
% 3.74/3.93  ;     1 with value 5               1 with value 10
% 3.74/3.93  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2933 entries:
% 3.74/3.93  ;     1 with value (4 5)         116 with value (4 17)           4 with value (4 30)
% 3.74/3.93  ;     3 with value (4 6)          63 with value (4 18)          29 with value (4 31)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    27 with value (4 7)          65 with value (4 19)           6 with value (4 32)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    20 with value (4 8)         134 with value (4 20)          13 with value (4 34)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    28 with value (4 9)         187 with value (4 21)          66 with value (4 35)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    57 with value (4 10)        239 with value (4 22)          30 with value (4 36)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    71 with value (4 11)        330 with value (4 23)          66 with value (4 39)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    43 with value (4 12)        211 with value (4 24)           6 with value (4 40)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    61 with value (4 13)        262 with value (4 25)           9 with value (4 42)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    34 with value (4 14)        284 with value (4 26)           8 with value (4 47)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    93 with value (4 15)        168 with value (4 27)          21 with value (4 48)
% 3.74/3.93  ;    43 with value (4 16)        111 with value (4 28)          24 with value (4 53)
% 3.74/3.93  Evaluation took:
% 3.74/3.93    3.447 seconds of real time
% 3.74/3.93    3.195285 seconds of user run time
% 3.74/3.93    0.252113 seconds of system run time
% 3.74/3.93    [Run times include 0.418 seconds GC run time.]
% 3.74/3.93    0 calls to %EVAL
% 3.74/3.93    0 page faults and
% 3.74/3.93    304,655,232 bytes consed.
% 3.74/3.93  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.74/3.93  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T10:09:20
% 3.74/3.93  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.74/3.93  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------