TSTP Solution File: RNG099+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : RNG099+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:37:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  40   ~;  35   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  25   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( aElement0(X1)
      & ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(xx)),xI)
        | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X1,xx,xI) )
      & ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(xy)),xJ)
        | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X1,xy,xJ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mSortsB,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aElement0(X1)
        & aElement0(X2) )
     => aElement0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsB) ).

fof(m__1332,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xw,smndt0(xx)),xI),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1332) ).

fof(m__1409,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xw,smndt0(xy)),xJ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1409) ).

fof(mEOfElem,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aElementOf0(X2,X1)
         => aElement0(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mEOfElem) ).

fof(m__1205,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xI)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( aElementOf0(X2,xI)
             => aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xI) )
          & ! [X2] :
              ( aElement0(X2)
             => aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X2,X1),xI) ) ) )
    & aIdeal0(xI)
    & aSet0(xJ)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,xJ)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
             => aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xJ) )
          & ! [X2] :
              ( aElement0(X2)
             => aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X2,X1),xJ) ) ) )
    & aIdeal0(xJ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1205) ).

fof(m__1319,hypothesis,
    xw = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xa),sdtasdt0(xx,xb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1319) ).

fof(mSortsB_02,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aElement0(X1)
        & aElement0(X2) )
     => aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsB_02) ).

fof(m__1294,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(xa,xI)
    & aElementOf0(xb,xJ)
    & sdtpldt0(xa,xb) = sz10 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1294) ).

fof(m__1217,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xx)
    & aElement0(xy) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1217) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ( aElement0(X1)
        & ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(xx)),xI)
          | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X1,xx,xI) )
        & ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(xy)),xJ)
          | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X1,xy,xJ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X86] :
      ( ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X86,smndt0(xy)),xJ)
        | ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X86,smndt0(xx)),xI)
        | ~ aElement0(X86) )
      & ( ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X86,xy,xJ)
        | ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X86,smndt0(xx)),xI)
        | ~ aElement0(X86) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X86,smndt0(xy)),xJ)
        | ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X86,xx,xI)
        | ~ aElement0(X86) )
      & ( ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X86,xy,xJ)
        | ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X86,xx,xI)
        | ~ aElement0(X86) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( ~ aElement0(X9)
      | ~ aElement0(X10)
      | aElement0(sdtpldt0(X9,X10)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSortsB])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(xy)),xJ)
    | ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(xx)),xI)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xw,smndt0(xx)),xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1332]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xw,smndt0(xy)),xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1409]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X34)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X35,X34)
      | aElement0(X35) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mEOfElem])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    ! [X77,X78,X79,X80,X81,X82] :
      ( aSet0(xI)
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X78,xI)
        | aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X77,X78),xI)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X77,xI) )
      & ( ~ aElement0(X79)
        | aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X79,X77),xI)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X77,xI) )
      & aIdeal0(xI)
      & aSet0(xJ)
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X81,xJ)
        | aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X80,X81),xJ)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X80,xJ) )
      & ( ~ aElement0(X82)
        | aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X82,X80),xJ)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X80,xJ) )
      & aIdeal0(xJ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__1205])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( aElement0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aElement0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    xw = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xa),sdtasdt0(xx,xb)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1319]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ~ aElement0(xw),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] :
      ( ~ aElement0(X11)
      | ~ aElement0(X12)
      | aElement0(sdtasdt0(X11,X12)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSortsB_02])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aSet0(X1)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xb,xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1294]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElement0(sdtasdt0(xx,xb))
    | ~ aElement0(sdtasdt0(xy,xa)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aElement0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xb),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xx),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1217]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xa,xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1294]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    ~ aElement0(sdtasdt0(xy,xa)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xa),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xy),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1217]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_26]),c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : RNG099+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 12:22:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.49  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 19505 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.49  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 19513 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.49  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 35
% 0.18/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 82
% 0.18/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.18/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 80
% 0.18/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 133
% 0.18/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 133
% 0.18/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 0.18/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.18/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.18/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 36
% 0.18/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23
% 0.18/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 27
% 0.18/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 0.18/0.49  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 36
% 0.18/0.49  # ...of those cached                   : 26
% 0.18/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 42
% 0.18/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.18/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.18/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 19
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 50
% 0.18/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 202
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 82
% 0.18/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 521
% 0.18/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 212
% 0.18/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
% 0.18/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.18/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.18/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6563
% 0.18/0.49  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1249
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.49  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1920 pages
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.18/0.49  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Total time               : 0.042 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.18/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------