TSTP Solution File: RNG074+2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : RNG074+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:14:23 EDT 2024
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__2590,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RTKE2t22Ft/E---3.1_25808.p',m__2590) ).
fof(m__2679,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xR,xS) = sdtpldt0(xP,xP),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RTKE2t22Ft/E---3.1_25808.p',m__2679) ).
fof(m__2610,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RTKE2t22Ft/E---3.1_25808.p',m__2610) ).
fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__2590]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xR,xS) = sdtpldt0(xP,xP),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2679]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2610]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : RNG074+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:39:13 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RTKE2t22Ft/E---3.1_25808.p
% 0.20/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # new_bool_1 with pid 25900 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25910 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.52 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.20/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 65
% 0.20/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses : 92
% 0.20/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 0.20/0.52 # Processed clauses : 62
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.20/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 60
% 0.20/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.20/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.20/0.52 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.20/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.20/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of those cached : 3
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 57
% 0.20/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.20/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.20/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 118
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 115
% 0.20/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5403
% 0.20/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 908
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2044 pages
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.20/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------