TSTP Solution File: RNG044+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.39s 2.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 8 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_33,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X1,X3)) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_29,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xv),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_30,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xu),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_31,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xy),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_31) ).
cnf(i_0_32,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xx),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_32) ).
cnf(i_0_27,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X3,X2)) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X3),X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wpbc4684/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X1,X3)) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xv),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xu),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xy),
i_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_46])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xx),
i_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_43]),c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_48])]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X3,X2)) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X3),X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_46]),c_0_48])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_44]),c_0_45])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : RNG044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 30 11:05:59 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.39/2.18 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.39/2.18 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.39/2.18 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.39/2.18 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 7.39/2.18 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.39/2.18 #
% 7.39/2.18 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.39/2.18
% 7.39/2.18 # Proof found!
% 7.39/2.18 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.39/2.18 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.39/2.18 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.39/2.18
% 7.39/2.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.39/2.18 # User time : 0.027 s
% 7.39/2.18 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.39/2.18 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 7.39/2.18 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.39/2.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------