TSTP Solution File: RNG044+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : RNG044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:26:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  22   ~;  16   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(mDistr,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aScalar0(X1)
        & aScalar0(X2)
        & aScalar0(X3) )
     => ( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3)) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X1,X3))
        & sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X3),sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mDistr) ).

fof(m__674,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xx)
    & aScalar0(xy)
    & aScalar0(xu)
    & aScalar0(xv) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__674) ).

fof(mSumSc,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aScalar0(X1)
        & aScalar0(X2) )
     => aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mSumSc) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( sdtasdt0(X4,sdtpldt0(X5,X6)) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X4,X5),sdtasdt0(X4,X6))
        | ~ aScalar0(X4)
        | ~ aScalar0(X5)
        | ~ aScalar0(X6) )
      & ( sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X4,X5),X6) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X4,X6),sdtasdt0(X5,X6))
        | ~ aScalar0(X4)
        | ~ aScalar0(X5)
        | ~ aScalar0(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDistr])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X3,sdtpldt0(X2,X1)) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X3,X2),sdtasdt0(X3,X1))
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xy),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__674]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xu),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__674]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xv),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__674]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xx),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__674]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]),c_0_13]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X3,X2),X1) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X3,X1),sdtasdt0(X2,X1))
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ aScalar0(X3)
      | ~ aScalar0(X4)
      | aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSumSc])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_13]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_11]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : RNG044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 30 11:25:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 20
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 12
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 0.22/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.22/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 21
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 19
% 0.22/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 71
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 70
% 0.22/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 71
% 0.22/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 17
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.22/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 52
% 0.22/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 208
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.22/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.22/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2113
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.22/1.40  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 2792 pages
% 0.22/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------