TSTP Solution File: RNG014-6 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : RNG014-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:54:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 24.97s 14.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 24.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  22 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   5   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (;  36   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ associator > multiply > commutator > add > #nlpp > additive_inverse > b > additive_identity > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(additive_identity,type,
    additive_identity: $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(associator,type,
    associator: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(commutator,type,
    commutator: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(additive_inverse,type,
    additive_inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_45,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( add(additive_identity,X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( multiply(X,additive_identity) = additive_identity ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_55,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( add(additive_inverse(X),X) = additive_identity ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_47,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( add(X,additive_identity) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_57,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( add(X,additive_inverse(X)) = additive_identity ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( multiply(X,add(Y,Z)) = add(multiply(X,Y),multiply(X,Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_71,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( add(X,add(Y,Z)) = add(add(X,Y),Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_87,axiom,
    multiply(a,additive_inverse(b)) != additive_inverse(multiply(a,b)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( add(additive_identity,X_1) = X_1 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_45]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [X_4] : ( multiply(X_4,additive_identity) = additive_identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [X_5] : ( add(additive_inverse(X_5),X_5) = additive_identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_2] : ( add(X_2,additive_identity) = X_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_47]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_6] : ( add(X_6,additive_inverse(X_6)) = additive_identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_1012,plain,
    ! [X_60,Y_61,Z_62] : ( add(multiply(X_60,Y_61),multiply(X_60,Z_62)) = multiply(X_60,add(Y_61,Z_62)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [X_16,Y_17,Z_18] : ( add(add(X_16,Y_17),Z_18) = add(X_16,add(Y_17,Z_18)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_17333,plain,
    ! [X_194,Y_195,Z_196,Z_197] : ( add(multiply(X_194,Y_195),add(multiply(X_194,Z_196),Z_197)) = add(multiply(X_194,add(Y_195,Z_196)),Z_197) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1012,c_22]) ).

tff(c_17687,plain,
    ! [X_194,Y_195,Z_196] : ( add(multiply(X_194,add(Y_195,Z_196)),additive_inverse(multiply(X_194,Z_196))) = add(multiply(X_194,Y_195),additive_identity) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_17333]) ).

tff(c_70691,plain,
    ! [X_392,Y_393,Z_394] : ( add(multiply(X_392,add(Y_393,Z_394)),additive_inverse(multiply(X_392,Z_394))) = multiply(X_392,Y_393) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_17687]) ).

tff(c_71413,plain,
    ! [X_392,X_5] : ( add(multiply(X_392,additive_identity),additive_inverse(multiply(X_392,X_5))) = multiply(X_392,additive_inverse(X_5)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_70691]) ).

tff(c_71491,plain,
    ! [X_392,X_5] : ( multiply(X_392,additive_inverse(X_5)) = additive_inverse(multiply(X_392,X_5)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_8,c_71413]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    multiply(a,additive_inverse(b)) != additive_inverse(multiply(a,b)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_87]) ).

tff(c_71500,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_71491,c_32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : RNG014-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:25:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 24.97/14.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 24.97/14.23  
% 24.97/14.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 24.97/14.25  
% 24.97/14.25  Inference rules
% 24.97/14.25  ----------------------
% 24.97/14.25  #Ref     : 0
% 24.97/14.25  #Sup     : 18186
% 24.97/14.25  #Fact    : 0
% 24.97/14.25  #Define  : 0
% 24.97/14.25  #Split   : 0
% 24.97/14.25  #Chain   : 0
% 24.97/14.25  #Close   : 0
% 24.97/14.25  
% 24.97/14.25  Ordering : KBO
% 24.97/14.25  
% 24.97/14.25  Simplification rules
% 24.97/14.25  ----------------------
% 24.97/14.25  #Subsume      : 2088
% 24.97/14.25  #Demod        : 28866
% 24.97/14.25  #Tautology    : 6710
% 24.97/14.25  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 24.97/14.25  #BackRed      : 6
% 24.97/14.25  
% 24.97/14.25  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 24.97/14.25  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 24.97/14.25  
% 24.97/14.25  Timing (in seconds)
% 24.97/14.25  ----------------------
% 24.97/14.25  Preprocessing        : 0.49
% 24.97/14.25  Parsing              : 0.25
% 24.97/14.25  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 24.97/14.25  Main loop            : 12.64
% 24.97/14.25  Inferencing          : 1.59
% 24.97/14.25  Reduction            : 9.11
% 24.97/14.25  Demodulation         : 8.71
% 24.97/14.25  BG Simplification    : 0.21
% 24.97/14.26  Subsumption          : 1.34
% 24.97/14.26  Abstraction          : 0.42
% 24.97/14.26  MUC search           : 0.00
% 24.97/14.26  Cooper               : 0.00
% 24.97/14.26  Total                : 13.18
% 24.97/14.26  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 24.97/14.26  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 24.97/14.26  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 24.97/14.26  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------