TSTP Solution File: RNG008-3 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : RNG008-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:57:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.26s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
    add(X0,additive_identity) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_identity) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    add(X0,additive_inverse(X0)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_inverse) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    multiply(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boolean_ring) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) = c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_times_b_is_c) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,a) != c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    add(additive_identity,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    add(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,add(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',distribute1) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    add(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(add(X0,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',distribute2) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',additive_inverse_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    additive_inverse(multiply(X0,X1)) = multiply(X0,additive_inverse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',multiply_additive_inverse1) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    additive_inverse(multiply(X0,X1)) = multiply(additive_inverse(X0),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',multiply_additive_inverse2) ).

cnf(c_65,plain,
    add(add(X0,X1),X2) = add(X0,add(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',associative_addition) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    add(X0,X1) = add(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/RNG002-0.ax',commutative_addition) ).

cnf(c_164,plain,
    multiply(b,a) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_165,plain,
    multiply(a,b) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_166,negated_conjecture,
    sP0_iProver_def != c,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_164]) ).

cnf(c_167,negated_conjecture,
    sP1_iProver_def = c,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_165]) ).

cnf(c_241,plain,
    add(X0,add(X1,X2)) = add(X1,add(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_254,plain,
    add(multiply(X0,add(X0,X1)),multiply(X1,add(X0,X1))) = add(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_51]) ).

cnf(c_284,plain,
    additive_inverse(multiply(X0,additive_inverse(X0))) = additive_inverse(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_51]) ).

cnf(c_291,plain,
    add(X0,add(additive_inverse(X0),X1)) = add(additive_identity,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_65]) ).

cnf(c_295,plain,
    add(X0,add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X0,X1)))) = additive_identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_340,plain,
    add(X0,add(X1,additive_inverse(X0))) = add(X1,additive_identity),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_241]) ).

cnf(c_350,plain,
    additive_inverse(X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_284,c_51,c_59,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_356,plain,
    add(X0,add(X1,X0)) = add(X1,additive_identity),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_340,c_350]) ).

cnf(c_357,plain,
    add(X0,add(X1,X0)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_356,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_363,plain,
    add(X0,X0) = additive_identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_295,c_350,c_357]) ).

cnf(c_364,plain,
    add(X0,add(X0,X1)) = add(additive_identity,X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_291,c_350]) ).

cnf(c_365,plain,
    add(X0,add(X0,X1)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_364,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_375,plain,
    add(add(X0,multiply(X0,X1)),add(multiply(X1,X0),X1)) = add(X0,X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_254,c_51,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_376,plain,
    add(X0,add(X1,add(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X1,X0)))) = add(X0,X1),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_375,c_65,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_894,plain,
    sP0_iProver_def != sP1_iProver_def,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_167,c_166]) ).

cnf(c_1059,plain,
    add(a,add(b,add(multiply(a,b),sP0_iProver_def))) = add(a,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_376]) ).

cnf(c_1165,plain,
    add(a,add(b,add(sP1_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def))) = add(a,b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1059,c_165]) ).

cnf(c_1166,plain,
    add(sP0_iProver_def,add(sP1_iProver_def,add(a,b))) = add(a,b),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1165,c_65,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_1563,plain,
    add(add(sP1_iProver_def,add(a,b)),add(a,b)) = sP0_iProver_def,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1166,c_357]) ).

cnf(c_1960,plain,
    add(sP1_iProver_def,add(a,add(a,add(b,b)))) = sP0_iProver_def,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1563,c_65,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_1961,plain,
    sP0_iProver_def = sP1_iProver_def,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1960,c_49,c_363,c_365]) ).

cnf(c_2493,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_894,c_1961]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : RNG008-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:20:06 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule casc_24_ueq --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 4.26/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------  iProver source info
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 4.26/1.19  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 4.26/1.19  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Parsing...successful
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  clauses                                 20
% 4.26/1.19  conjectures                             2
% 4.26/1.19  EPR                                     2
% 4.26/1.19  Horn                                    20
% 4.26/1.19  unary                                   20
% 4.26/1.19  binary                                  0
% 4.26/1.19  lits                                    20
% 4.26/1.19  lits eq                                 20
% 4.26/1.19  fd_pure                                 0
% 4.26/1.19  fd_pseudo                               0
% 4.26/1.19  fd_cond                                 0
% 4.26/1.19  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 4.26/1.19  AC symbols                              1
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------ 
% 4.26/1.19  Current options:
% 4.26/1.19  ------ 
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.26/1.19  
% 4.26/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------