TSTP Solution File: REL048+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : REL048+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 22:03:44 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.93s
% Output   : Solution 0.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8008/REL048+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8008/REL048+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8008/REL048+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 8104
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux1_join_commutativity)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:join(X1,join(X2,X3))=join(join(X1,X2),X3),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux2_join_associativity)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:converse(converse(X1))=X1,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', converse_idempotence)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:X1=join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan)).
% fof(8, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:meet(X1,X2)=complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', maddux4_definiton_of_meet)).
% fof(9, axiom,![X1]:top=join(X1,complement(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', def_top)).
% fof(10, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:converse(composition(X1,X2))=composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', converse_multiplicativity)).
% fof(11, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2))=complement(X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', converse_cancellativity)).
% fof(12, axiom,![X1]:composition(X1,one)=X1,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', composition_identity)).
% fof(13, axiom,![X1]:zero=meet(X1,complement(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', def_zero)).
% fof(14, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(join(join(X1,X2),X3)=X3=>(join(X1,X3)=X3&join(X2,X3)=X3)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', goals)).
% fof(15, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(join(join(X1,X2),X3)=X3=>(join(X1,X3)=X3&join(X2,X3)=X3))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[14])).
% fof(16, plain,![X3]:![X4]:join(X3,X4)=join(X4,X3),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1])).
% cnf(17,plain,(join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(18, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:join(X4,join(X5,X6))=join(join(X4,X5),X6),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2])).
% cnf(19,plain,(join(X1,join(X2,X3))=join(join(X1,X2),X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(22, plain,![X2]:converse(converse(X2))=X2,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4])).
% cnf(23,plain,(converse(converse(X1))=X1),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X3]:![X4]:X3=join(complement(join(complement(X3),complement(X4))),complement(join(complement(X3),X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(25,plain,(X1=join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(30, plain,![X3]:![X4]:meet(X3,X4)=complement(join(complement(X3),complement(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[8])).
% cnf(31,plain,(meet(X1,X2)=complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30])).
% fof(32, plain,![X2]:top=join(X2,complement(X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[9])).
% cnf(33,plain,(top=join(X1,complement(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32])).
% fof(34, plain,![X3]:![X4]:converse(composition(X3,X4))=composition(converse(X4),converse(X3)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10])).
% cnf(35,plain,(converse(composition(X1,X2))=composition(converse(X2),converse(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34])).
% fof(36, plain,![X3]:![X4]:join(composition(converse(X3),complement(composition(X3,X4))),complement(X4))=complement(X4),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[11])).
% cnf(37,plain,(join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2))=complement(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36])).
% fof(38, plain,![X2]:composition(X2,one)=X2,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12])).
% cnf(39,plain,(composition(X1,one)=X1),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[38])).
% fof(40, plain,![X2]:zero=meet(X2,complement(X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13])).
% cnf(41,plain,(zero=meet(X1,complement(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[40])).
% fof(42, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:(join(join(X1,X2),X3)=X3&(~(join(X1,X3)=X3)|~(join(X2,X3)=X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15])).
% fof(43, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:(join(join(X4,X5),X6)=X6&(~(join(X4,X6)=X6)|~(join(X5,X6)=X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[42])).
% fof(44, negated_conjecture,(join(join(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)=esk3_0&(~(join(esk1_0,esk3_0)=esk3_0)|~(join(esk2_0,esk3_0)=esk3_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[43])).
% cnf(45,negated_conjecture,(join(esk2_0,esk3_0)!=esk3_0|join(esk1_0,esk3_0)!=esk3_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44])).
% cnf(46,negated_conjecture,(join(join(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)=esk3_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44])).
% cnf(47,plain,(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1))))=zero),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[41,31,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(48,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,join(esk1_0,esk2_0))=esk3_0),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[46,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(49,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,esk1_0)!=esk3_0|join(esk2_0,esk3_0)!=esk3_0),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[45,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(50,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,esk1_0)!=esk3_0|join(esk3_0,esk2_0)!=esk3_0),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[49,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(57,plain,(composition(converse(X1),X2)=converse(composition(converse(X2),X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[35,23,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(60,plain,(join(X1,join(X2,X3))=join(X3,join(X1,X2))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(63,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,X1)=join(esk3_0,join(join(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[19,48,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(70,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,X1)=join(esk3_0,join(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,X1)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[63,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(141,plain,(converse(converse(X1))=composition(converse(one),X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[57,39,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(149,plain,(X1=composition(converse(one),X1)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[141,23,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(153,plain,(one=converse(one)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[39,149,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(170,plain,(composition(one,X1)=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[149,153,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(223,plain,(complement(top)=zero),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[47,33,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(691,plain,(join(complement(X2),composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))))=complement(X2)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[37,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(699,plain,(join(complement(X1),composition(converse(one),complement(X1)))=complement(X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[691,170,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(716,plain,(join(complement(X1),complement(X1))=complement(X1)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[699,153,theory(equality)]),170,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(732,plain,(join(zero,zero)=zero),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[716,223,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(745,plain,(join(zero,X1)=join(zero,join(zero,X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[19,732,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(913,plain,(join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))))=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[25,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(925,plain,(join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X1))),complement(top))=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[913,33,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(939,plain,(join(complement(complement(X1)),zero)=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[925,716,theory(equality)]),223,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(946,plain,(join(zero,complement(complement(X1)))=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[939,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1003,plain,(join(zero,X1)=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[745,946,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1038,plain,(complement(complement(X1))=X1),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[946,1003,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1062,plain,(join(X1,X1)=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[716,1038,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1087,plain,(join(X1,X2)=join(X2,join(X1,X2))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,1062,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1576,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,join(esk1_0,esk2_0))=join(esk3_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[70,1062,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1581,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,join(esk2_0,esk1_0))=join(esk3_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[70,1087,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1601,negated_conjecture,(esk3_0=join(esk3_0,esk2_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1576,48,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1612,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,esk1_0)!=esk3_0|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[50,1601,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1613,negated_conjecture,(join(esk3_0,esk1_0)!=esk3_0),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1612,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1968,negated_conjecture,(esk3_0=join(esk3_0,esk1_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1581,17,theory(equality)]),48,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1969,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1968,1613,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1970,negated_conjecture,($false),1969,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 177
% # ...of these trivial                : 69
% # ...subsumed                        : 28
% # ...remaining for further processing: 80
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 27
% # Generated clauses                  : 1014
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 643
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 1014
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 52
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 49
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 1
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 0
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 348
% # ...number of literals in the above : 348
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 124
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 62
% # Backwards rewriting index:    93 leaves,   1.24+/-0.724 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           45 leaves,   1.18+/-0.607 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           82 leaves,   1.22+/-0.663 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.028 s
% # System time            : 0.006 s
% # Total time             : 0.034 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.13 CPU 0.22 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.13 CPU 0.22 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8008/REL048+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------