TSTP Solution File: REL023+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : REL023+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:13:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.96s 2.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 30 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 29 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 45 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
composition(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
join(composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),composition(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0))))) != composition(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(join(X1,X3),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jzhb7rfc/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
composition(X1,one) = X1,
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
converse(one) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
composition(one,X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
join(composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),composition(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0))))) != composition(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_30]),c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
join(composition(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),composition(complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0)))),complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0))))) != composition(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X3,X2)) = composition(join(X1,X3),X2),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
join(complement(X1),join(complement(X1),X2)) = join(complement(X1),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
composition(join(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0))))),complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))) != composition(esk1_0,complement(join(complement(esk2_0),complement(esk3_0)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
join(X1,complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : REL023+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 09:16:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.96/2.50 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.96/2.50 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.96/2.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 6.96/2.50
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof found!
% 6.96/2.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.96/2.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object total steps : 30
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object clause steps : 21
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 6.96/2.50 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 6.96/2.50 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.96/2.50 # Parsed axioms : 13
% 6.96/2.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Initial clauses : 13
% 6.96/2.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 6.96/2.50 # Processed clauses : 69
% 6.96/2.50 # ...of these trivial : 10
% 6.96/2.50 # ...subsumed : 13
% 6.96/2.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 46
% 6.96/2.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Backward-rewritten : 13
% 6.96/2.50 # Generated clauses : 595
% 6.96/2.50 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 425
% 6.96/2.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Paramodulations : 595
% 6.96/2.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 6.96/2.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 30
% 6.96/2.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 6.96/2.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 291
% 6.96/2.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 291
% 6.96/2.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 6.96/2.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 6.96/2.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 46
% 6.96/2.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 6.96/2.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.96/2.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5255
% 6.96/2.50
% 6.96/2.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.96/2.50 # User time : 0.031 s
% 6.96/2.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 6.96/2.50 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 6.96/2.50 # ...preprocessing : 0.026 s
% 6.96/2.50 # ...main loop : 0.008 s
% 6.96/2.50 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 6.96/2.50
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------