TSTP Solution File: REL014+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : REL014+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:13:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 21 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5IH9XrtusL/E---3.1_5032.p',converse_multiplicativity) ).
fof(composition_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5IH9XrtusL/E---3.1_5032.p',composition_identity) ).
fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5IH9XrtusL/E---3.1_5032.p',converse_idempotence) ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( composition(X1,one) = X1
& composition(one,X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5IH9XrtusL/E---3.1_5032.p',goals) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X11,X12] : converse(composition(X11,X12)) = composition(converse(X12),converse(X11)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X15] : composition(X15,one) = X15,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
composition(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X21] : converse(converse(X21)) = X21,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
composition(converse(one),converse(X1)) = converse(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( composition(X1,one) = X1
& composition(one,X1) = X1 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( composition(esk1_0,one) != esk1_0
| composition(one,esk1_0) != esk1_0 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
converse(one) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( composition(esk1_0,one) != esk1_0
| composition(one,esk1_0) != esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
composition(one,X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_7])]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : REL014+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:36:04 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5IH9XrtusL/E---3.1_5032.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 5154 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with pid 5163 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 21
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 18
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 91
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 72
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 91
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 97
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of those cached : 33
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 61
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1413
% 0.20/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 32
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------