TSTP Solution File: PUZ146^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : PUZ146^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:28:52 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 21 unt; 12 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 11 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 17 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^ 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
earthling: $tType ).
thf(type_def_6,type,
hobby: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
hobby: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
earthling: $tType ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
peter: earthling ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
mary: earthling ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
beer_drinking: hobby ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
belly_dancing: hobby ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
weight_lifting: hobby ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
has_hobby: earthling > hobby > $o ).
thf(func_def_8,type,
peters_hobbies: hobby > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
marys_hobbies: hobby > $o ).
thf(f44,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f39,f40]) ).
thf(f40,plain,
( ( has_hobby @ mary @ beer_drinking )
!= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f32,f35]) ).
thf(f35,plain,
( marys_hobbies
= ( has_hobby @ mary ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
( marys_hobbies
= ( has_hobby @ mary ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,axiom,
( marys_hobbies
= ( has_hobby @ mary ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',marys_hobbies_002) ).
thf(f32,plain,
( ( marys_hobbies @ beer_drinking )
!= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
thf(f25,plain,
( ( marys_hobbies @ beer_drinking )
!= $true ),
inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( ( marys_hobbies @ beer_drinking )
!= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
~ ( marys_hobbies @ beer_drinking ),
inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,axiom,
~ ( marys_hobbies @ beer_drinking ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mary_does_not_do_beer_drinking) ).
thf(f39,plain,
( ( has_hobby @ mary @ beer_drinking )
= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f27,f38]) ).
thf(f38,plain,
( peters_hobbies
= ( has_hobby @ mary ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f31,f35]) ).
thf(f31,plain,
peters_hobbies = marys_hobbies,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).
thf(f26,plain,
peters_hobbies = marys_hobbies,
inference(flattening,[],[f24]) ).
thf(f24,plain,
~ ( ( peters_hobbies != marys_hobbies ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f10]) ).
thf(f10,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( peters_hobbies != marys_hobbies ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,conjecture,
peters_hobbies != marys_hobbies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',peter_and_mary_have_different_hobbies) ).
thf(f27,plain,
( ( peters_hobbies @ beer_drinking )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( ( peters_hobbies @ beer_drinking )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f19]) ).
thf(f19,plain,
peters_hobbies @ beer_drinking,
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,axiom,
peters_hobbies @ beer_drinking,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',peter_does_beer_drinking) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : PUZ146^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 11:01:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.36 % (18535)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.19/0.36 % (18535)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.37 % (18535)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.37 % (18527)Success in time 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------