TSTP Solution File: PUZ146^1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : PUZ146^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:25:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.40s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 13 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 5 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 6 ~; 1 |; 0 &; 26 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 ^ 2 !; 0 ?; 2 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
earthling: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
hobby: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
peter: earthling ).
thf(decl_23,type,
mary: earthling ).
thf(decl_24,type,
beer_drinking: hobby ).
thf(decl_27,type,
has_hobby: earthling > hobby > $o ).
thf(decl_28,type,
peters_hobbies: hobby > $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
marys_hobbies: hobby > $o ).
thf(peter_and_mary_have_different_hobbies,conjecture,
peters_hobbies != marys_hobbies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',peter_and_mary_have_different_hobbies) ).
thf(peters_hobbies_001,axiom,
( peters_hobbies
= ( has_hobby @ peter ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',peters_hobbies_001) ).
thf(marys_hobbies_002,axiom,
( marys_hobbies
= ( has_hobby @ mary ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',marys_hobbies_002) ).
thf(mary_does_not_do_beer_drinking,axiom,
~ ( marys_hobbies @ beer_drinking ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mary_does_not_do_beer_drinking) ).
thf(peter_does_beer_drinking,axiom,
peters_hobbies @ beer_drinking,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',peter_does_beer_drinking) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ( has_hobby @ peter )
= ( has_hobby @ mary ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[peter_and_mary_have_different_hobbies]),peters_hobbies_001]),marys_hobbies_002])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
~ ( has_hobby @ mary @ beer_drinking ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[mary_does_not_do_beer_drinking,marys_hobbies_002])]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ( has_hobby @ peter )
= ( has_hobby @ mary ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
~ ( has_hobby @ mary @ beer_drinking ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: hobby] :
( ( has_hobby @ mary @ X1 )
<=> ( has_hobby @ peter @ X1 ) ),
inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
has_hobby @ peter @ beer_drinking,
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[peter_does_beer_drinking,peters_hobbies_001]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
~ ( has_hobby @ mary @ beer_drinking ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: hobby] :
( ( has_hobby @ mary @ X1 )
| ~ ( has_hobby @ peter @ X1 ) ),
inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
has_hobby @ peter @ beer_drinking,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.15 % Problem : PUZ146^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.04/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % DateTime : Sat May 18 11:01:53 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.54 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.40/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSSN.
% 0.40/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting ehoh_best3_fo with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # post_as_ho12 with pid 5842 completed with status 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.40/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSSN.
% 0.40/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting ehoh_best3_fo with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.40/0.55 # Search class: HUUSF-FFSS00-SSSFMFNN
% 0.40/0.55 # partial match(2): HUUSF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.40/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # new_ho_10 with pid 5846 completed with status 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.40/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSSN.
% 0.40/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting ehoh_best3_fo with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.40/0.55 # Search class: HUUSF-FFSS00-SSSFMFNN
% 0.40/0.55 # partial match(2): HUUSF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.40/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/0.55 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.40/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.40/0.55
% 0.40/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.40/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.40/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.40/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.40/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 0.40/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.40/0.55 # Processed clauses : 21
% 0.40/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.40/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.40/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.40/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.40/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.40/0.55 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.40/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.40/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.40/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.40/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.40/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.40/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.40/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 21
% 0.40/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.40/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 487
% 0.40/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 30
% 0.40/0.55
% 0.40/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/0.55 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.40/0.55 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.40/0.55 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.40/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.40/0.55
% 0.40/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/0.55 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.40/0.55 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.40/0.55 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.40/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.40/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.40/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------