TSTP Solution File: PUZ140^2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : PUZ140^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:28:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 10 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 39 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 91 ( 22 ~; 11 |; 11 &; 46 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 16 ( 16 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 0 ^ 22 !; 10 ?; 33 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
beverage: $tType ).
thf(type_def_6,type,
syrup: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
syrup: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
beverage: $tType ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
coffee: beverage ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
mix: beverage > syrup > beverage ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
coffee_mixture: syrup > beverage ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
hot: beverage > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
sK0: ( syrup > beverage ) > syrup ).
thf(func_def_11,type,
ph2:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f23,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f22]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
coffee != coffee,
inference(superposition,[],[f21,f17]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
! [X0: syrup] :
( coffee
= ( mix @ coffee @ X0 ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f15,f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
( coffee_mixture
= ( mix @ coffee ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,axiom,
( coffee_mixture
= ( mix @ coffee ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',coffee_mixture_definition) ).
thf(f15,plain,
! [X0: syrup] :
( coffee
= ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
! [X0: syrup] :
( ( coffee
= ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
& ( ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
! [X0: syrup] :
( ( coffee
= ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
& ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,axiom,
! [X0: syrup] :
( ( coffee
= ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
& ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',coffee_and_syrup_is_hot_coffee) ).
thf(f21,plain,
! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
( coffee
!= ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( ( hot @ coffee )
= $true ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f18,f17]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
! [X0: syrup] :
( ( hot @ ( mix @ coffee @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f16]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
! [X0: syrup] :
( ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f19,plain,
! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
( ( coffee
!= ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
| ( ( hot @ coffee )
!= $true ) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
! [X2: beverage,X0: syrup > beverage] :
( ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( coffee != X2 )
| ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
!= X2 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
! [X0: syrup > beverage,X2: beverage] :
( ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( coffee != X2 )
| ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
!= X2 ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f10,f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
( ? [X1: syrup] :
! [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( coffee != X2 )
| ( ( X0 @ X1 )
!= X2 ) )
=> ! [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( coffee != X2 )
| ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
!= X2 ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
? [X1: syrup] :
! [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( coffee != X2 )
| ( ( X0 @ X1 )
!= X2 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
~ ? [X0: syrup > beverage] :
! [X1: syrup] :
? [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( hot @ X2 )
= $true )
& ( coffee = X2 )
& ( ( X0 @ X1 )
= X2 ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
~ ? [X0: syrup > beverage] :
! [X1: syrup] :
? [X2: beverage] :
( ( hot @ X2 )
& ( coffee = X2 )
& ( ( X0 @ X1 )
= X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: syrup > beverage] :
! [X0: syrup] :
? [X2: beverage] :
( ( hot @ X2 )
& ( coffee = X2 )
& ( ( X1 @ X0 )
= X2 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,conjecture,
? [X1: syrup > beverage] :
! [X0: syrup] :
? [X2: beverage] :
( ( hot @ X2 )
& ( coffee = X2 )
& ( ( X1 @ X0 )
= X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',there_is_hot_coffee) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11 % Problem : PUZ140^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat May 18 10:42:22 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.34 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 % (16232)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16239)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16233)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % (16234)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16236)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16237)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16232)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (16235)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (16231)Success in time 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.36 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------