TSTP Solution File: PUZ128+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : PUZ128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:08:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.34s 2.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( patricide(X1)
| ~ patricide(X2)
| ~ parent_of(X2,X1)
| ~ parent_of(iokaste,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fb_qqnam/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
parent_of(iokaste,oedipus),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fb_qqnam/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
patricide(oedipus),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fb_qqnam/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
parent_of(oedipus,polyneikes),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fb_qqnam/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
parent_of(iokaste,polyneikes),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fb_qqnam/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
parent_of(polyneikes,thersandros),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fb_qqnam/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
~ patricide(thersandros),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fb_qqnam/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( patricide(X1)
| ~ patricide(X2)
| ~ parent_of(X2,X1)
| ~ parent_of(iokaste,X2) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
parent_of(iokaste,oedipus),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
patricide(oedipus),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( patricide(X1)
| ~ parent_of(oedipus,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
parent_of(oedipus,polyneikes),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
parent_of(iokaste,polyneikes),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
patricide(polyneikes),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( patricide(X1)
| ~ parent_of(polyneikes,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
parent_of(polyneikes,thersandros),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
~ patricide(thersandros),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : PUZ128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 00:03:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.34/2.09 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.34/2.09 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.34/2.09 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.34/2.09 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_N___023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SE_S0Y
% 4.34/2.09 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 4.34/2.09 #
% 4.34/2.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 4.34/2.09
% 4.34/2.09 # Proof found!
% 4.34/2.09 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.34/2.09 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.34/2.09 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.34/2.09
% 4.34/2.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.34/2.09 # User time : 0.022 s
% 4.34/2.09 # System time : 0.006 s
% 4.34/2.09 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 4.34/2.09 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 4.34/2.09
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------