TSTP Solution File: PUZ084^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : PUZ084^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:25:08 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  17 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  13   ~;  10   |;   1   &;  62   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   71 (  71   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (  33   ^  16   !;   0   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_24,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    mforall_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_39,type,
    mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_49,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_53,type,
    peter: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    wife: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_56,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_57,type,
    epred1_0: $i > $o ).

thf(mimplies,axiom,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ X7 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mimplies) ).

thf(mnot,axiom,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ~ ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mnot) ).

thf(mor,axiom,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X6 @ X3 )
          | ( X7 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mor) ).

thf(mforall_prop,axiom,
    ( mforall_prop
    = ( ^ [X9: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X10: $i > $o] : ( X9 @ X10 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mforall_prop) ).

thf(mbox,axiom,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X13 @ X3 @ X14 )
          | ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mbox) ).

thf(mvalid,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).

thf(mreflexive,axiom,
    ( mreflexive
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] : ( X13 @ X15 @ X15 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mreflexive) ).

thf(conj,conjecture,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_prop
      @ ^ [X18: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ ( wife @ peter ) @ X18 ) @ X18 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(refl_wife_peter,axiom,
    mreflexive @ ( wife @ peter ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',refl_wife_peter) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
          ~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( mforall_prop
    = ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
        ! [X10: $i > $o] : ( Z0 @ X10 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_prop]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X14 )
          | ( Z1 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( mreflexive
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] : ( Z0 @ X15 @ X15 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mreflexive]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X36: $i,X35: $i > $o] :
        ( ~ ! [X34: $i] :
              ( ~ ( wife @ peter @ X36 @ X34 )
              | ( X35 @ X34 ) )
        | ( X35 @ X36 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X24: $i] : ( wife @ peter @ X24 @ X24 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[refl_wife_peter,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X51: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( wife @ peter @ esk1_0 @ X51 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ X51 ) )
      & ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X39: $i] : ( wife @ peter @ X39 @ X39 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( wife @ peter @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( wife @ peter @ X3 @ X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ084^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 10:46:37 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 2230 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.47  # Search class: HHUNS-FFSF00-SHHSMFNN
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_ho_10 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_9 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # new_bool_9 with pid 2238 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Result found by new_bool_9
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.47  # Search class: HHUNS-FFSF00-SHHSMFNN
% 0.19/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_ho_10 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Starting new_bool_9 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 73
% 0.19/0.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Initial clauses                      : 43
% 0.19/0.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 35
% 0.19/0.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.19/0.47  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 0.19/0.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 0.19/0.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.19/0.47  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.19/0.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 5
% 0.19/0.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.19/0.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.19/0.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.19/0.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 9
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.19/0.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.19/0.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.19/0.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.19/0.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2512
% 0.19/0.47  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 476
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.47  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.47  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.19/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.19/0.47  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.47  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------