TSTP Solution File: PUZ080+2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : PUZ080+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:54:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 62.52s 38.81s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : PUZ080+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 17:37:36 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 62.52/38.80
% 62.52/38.81 % SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 62.52/38.81
% 62.52/38.81 Inference rules
% 62.52/38.81 ----------------------
% 62.52/38.81 #Ref : 0
% 62.52/38.81 #Sup : 0
% 62.52/38.81 #Fact : 0
% 62.52/38.81 #Define : 0
% 62.52/38.81 #Split : 0
% 62.52/38.81 #Chain : 0
% 62.52/38.81 #Close : 0
% 62.52/38.81
% 62.52/38.81 Ordering : KBO
% 62.52/38.81
% 62.52/38.81 Simplification rules
% 62.52/38.81 ----------------------
% 62.52/38.81 #Subsume : 9599
% 62.52/38.81 #Demod : 1343
% 62.52/38.81 #Tautology : 226
% 62.52/38.81 #SimpNegUnit : 1446
% 62.52/38.81 #BackRed : 0
% 62.52/38.81
% 62.52/38.81 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 62.52/38.81 #Strategies tried : 1
% 62.52/38.81
% 62.52/38.81 Timing (in seconds)
% 62.52/38.81 ----------------------
% 62.52/38.81 Preprocessing : 5.43
% 62.52/38.81 Parsing : 3.33
% 62.52/38.81 CNF conversion : 0.49
% 62.52/38.81 Main loop : 32.31
% 62.52/38.81 Inferencing : 0.38
% 62.52/38.81 Reduction : 17.76
% 62.52/38.81 Demodulation : 12.41
% 62.52/38.81 BG Simplification : 0.68
% 62.52/38.81 Subsumption : 10.16
% 62.52/38.81 Abstraction : 0.42
% 62.52/38.81 MUC search : 0.00
% 62.52/38.81 Cooper : 0.00
% 62.52/38.81 Total : 37.76
% 62.52/38.81 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 62.52/38.81 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 62.52/38.81 Index Matching : 0.00
% 62.52/38.81 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------