TSTP Solution File: PUZ038-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : PUZ038-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:54:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.75s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
state(bb(o,s(o)),v1(o,o),v2(o,s(s(s(o)))),v3(s(s(o)),o),v4(s(s(o)),s(s(s(o)))),h(s(s(o)),s(o)),s1(s(s(s(o))),s(o)),s2(s(s(s(o))),s(s(o))),s3(s(s(s(s(o)))),s(o)),s4(s(s(s(s(o)))),s(s(o))),e1(s(s(s(s(o)))),o),e2(s(s(s(s(o)))),s(s(s(o))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ state(X0,X1,X2,v3(s(s(s(o))),o),X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_state) ).
cnf(c_77,plain,
( ~ state(X0,X1,X2,v3(X3,X4),X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,e1(s(s(X3)),X4),X11)
| state(X0,X1,X2,v3(s(X3),X4),X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,e1(X3,X4),X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PUZ004-0.ax',v3_down) ).
cnf(c_509,plain,
s(o) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_510,plain,
s(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_511,plain,
s(sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_512,plain,
v3(sP2_iProver_def,o) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_513,negated_conjecture,
~ state(X0,X1,X2,sP3_iProver_def,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_509,c_510,c_511,c_512]) ).
cnf(c_1899,plain,
state(bb(o,sP0_iProver_def),v1(o,o),v2(o,sP2_iProver_def),v3(sP1_iProver_def,o),v4(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),h(sP1_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),s1(sP2_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),s2(sP2_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def),s3(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP0_iProver_def),s4(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP1_iProver_def),e1(s(sP2_iProver_def),o),e2(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_509,c_510,c_511]) ).
cnf(c_2667,plain,
( ~ state(X0,X1,X2,v3(sP1_iProver_def,X3),X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,e1(s(sP2_iProver_def),X3),X10)
| state(X0,X1,X2,v3(s(sP1_iProver_def),X3),X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,e1(sP1_iProver_def,X3),X10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_511,c_77]) ).
cnf(c_2668,plain,
( ~ state(X0,X1,X2,v3(sP1_iProver_def,X3),X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,e1(s(sP2_iProver_def),X3),X10)
| state(X0,X1,X2,v3(sP2_iProver_def,X3),X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,e1(sP1_iProver_def,X3),X10) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2667,c_511]) ).
cnf(c_3383,plain,
state(bb(o,sP0_iProver_def),v1(o,o),v2(o,sP2_iProver_def),v3(sP2_iProver_def,o),v4(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),h(sP1_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),s1(sP2_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),s2(sP2_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def),s3(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP0_iProver_def),s4(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP1_iProver_def),e1(sP1_iProver_def,o),e2(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1899,c_2668]) ).
cnf(c_3390,plain,
state(bb(o,sP0_iProver_def),v1(o,o),v2(o,sP2_iProver_def),sP3_iProver_def,v4(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),h(sP1_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),s1(sP2_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),s2(sP2_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def),s3(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP0_iProver_def),s4(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP1_iProver_def),e1(sP1_iProver_def,o),e2(s(sP2_iProver_def),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3383,c_512]) ).
cnf(c_3391,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3390,c_513]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : PUZ038-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:01:49 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.75/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.75/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.75/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 clauses 47
% 2.75/1.18 conjectures 1
% 2.75/1.18 EPR 1
% 2.75/1.18 Horn 47
% 2.75/1.18 unary 6
% 2.75/1.18 binary 41
% 2.75/1.18 lits 88
% 2.75/1.18 lits eq 4
% 2.75/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 2.75/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.75/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 2.75/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.75/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------
% 2.75/1.18 Current options:
% 2.75/1.18 ------
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.75/1.18
% 2.75/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------