TSTP Solution File: PUZ038-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : PUZ038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:23:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.08 % Problem : PUZ038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.08 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.06/0.26 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.06/0.26 % DateTime : Sun May 29 00:07:26 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.49/0.79 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.49/0.79 Process 607 was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.49/0.79 Sun May 29 00:07:26 2022
% 0.49/0.79 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_423_n032.cluster.edu".
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_423_n032.cluster.edu
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.49/0.79 set(auto2).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.49/0.79 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.49/0.79 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.49/0.79 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.49/0.79 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.49/0.79 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.49/0.79 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.49/0.79 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.49/0.79 clear(print_given).
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (43 formulas)
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 Auto_denials:
% 0.49/0.79 % copying label goal_state to answer in negative clause
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % Assigning unary symbol s kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (15).
% 0.49/0.79 Function symbol KB weights: o=1. e1=1. e2=1. bb=1. h=1. s1=1. s2=1. s3=1. s4=1. v1=1. v2=1. v3=1. v4=1. s=0.
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.49/0.79 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds: goal_state.
% 0.49/0.79 % Length of proof is 5.
% 0.49/0.79 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.49/0.79 % Maximum clause weight is 82.000.
% 0.49/0.79 % Given clauses 24.
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 1 state(bb(o,s(o)),v1(o,o),v2(o,s(s(s(o)))),v3(s(s(o)),o),v4(s(s(o)),s(s(s(o)))),h(s(s(o)),s(o)),s1(s(s(s(o))),s(o)),s2(s(s(s(o))),s(s(o))),s3(s(s(s(s(o)))),s(o)),s4(s(s(s(s(o)))),s(s(o))),e1(s(s(s(s(o)))),o),e2(s(s(s(s(o)))),s(s(s(o))))) # label(initial_state) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79 2 -state(A,B,C,v3(s(s(s(o))),o),D,E,F,V6,V7,V8,V9,V10) # label(goal_state) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goal_state). [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79 24 -state(A,B,C,v3(D,E),F,V6,V7,V8,V9,V10,e1(s(s(D)),E),V11) | state(A,B,C,v3(s(D),E),F,V6,V7,V8,V9,V10,e1(D,E),V11) # label(v3_down) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79 46 -state(A,B,C,v3(s(s(o)),o),D,E,F,V6,V7,V8,e1(s(s(s(s(o)))),o),V9) # answer(goal_state). [resolve(24,b,2,a)].
% 0.49/0.79 47 $F # answer(goal_state). [resolve(46,a,1,a)].
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 Given=24. Generated=88. Kept=46. proofs=1.
% 0.49/0.79 Usable=24. Sos=21. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=43. Hints=0.
% 0.49/0.79 Megabytes=0.15.
% 0.49/0.79 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.49/0.79 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.49/0.79
% 0.49/0.79 Process 607 exit (max_proofs) Sun May 29 00:07:26 2022
% 0.49/0.79 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------