TSTP Solution File: PUZ030-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ030-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:59:32 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23524/PUZ/PUZ030-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 273] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1324] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8703] [nf = 144] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 43394] [nf = 1388] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 135335] [nf = 6514] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 380912] [nf = 17802] [nu = 104] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1215002] [nf = 52496] [nu = 844] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4199730] [nf = 187011] [nu = 3704] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 38 secs [nr = 13743405] [nf = 689340] [nu = 10859] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 41061812] [nf = 2221137] [nu = 28480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41645149] [nf = 2251946] [nu = 28887] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41645404] [nf = 2251946] [nu = 28887] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41646644] [nf = 2251956] [nu = 28887] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41656716] [nf = 2252229] [nu = 28895] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41736714] [nf = 2255476] [nu = 28925] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 42427559] [nf = 2285949] [nu = 28955] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 136 secs [nr = 48740859] [nf = 2675111] [nu = 29307] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 251 secs [nr = 104635733] [nf = 7122979] [nu = 32135] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 139054961
% resolvents: 129619086 factors: 9435875
% Number of unit clauses generated: 33678
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.02
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [7] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 33678 [2] = 5901510 [3] = 49182425 [4] = 55784861 [5] = 27491016 [6] = 655616
% [7] = 2152 [8] = 3440 [9] = 263
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] both_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] mustard_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] neither_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] oneof_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] salt_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)0 (-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 305746288
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 465865079
% Number of successful unifications: 139054961
% Number of unification failures: 110393087
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 840042189
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1272405018
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 10
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 21879
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 1
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 3.00
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 249448048
% ConstructUnitClause() = 21880
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.03 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 463517
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------