TSTP Solution File: PUZ028-4 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : PUZ028-4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:58:36 EST 2010

% Result   : GaveUp 2.48s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27167/PUZ/PUZ028-4+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 720] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2880] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 6480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 13680] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 17280] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 20880] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 24480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 28080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 31680] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 35280] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 38880] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 42480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 46080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 49680] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 53280] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 56880] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 60480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 64080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 67680] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 71280] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 74880] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 78480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 82080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 85680] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 89280] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 92880] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 96480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 100080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 100080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 100800] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 102960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 106560] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 110160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 113760] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 117360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 120960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 12
% 4560] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 128160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 131760] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 135360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 138960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 142560] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 146160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 149760] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 153360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 156960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 160560] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 164160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 167760] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 171360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 174960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 178560] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 182160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 185760] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 189360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 192960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 196560] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 200160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 200160
% 	resolvents: 200160	factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% Total = 0
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [3] = 200160	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] familiar_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] not_familiar_2	(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)0	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 0
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 7200
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 200160
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1084320
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 16206300
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 0
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: nan
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 200160
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 100080
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 2 secs
% CPU time: 2.48 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------