TSTP Solution File: PUZ023-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : PUZ023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:26:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.94s
% Output   : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : PUZ023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sat May 28 21:46:24 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.17/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.17/0.34  Sat May 28 21:46:24 2022
% 0.17/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 19037.
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.17/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.17/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.17/0.34  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.17/0.34  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.17/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.41/0.61  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.41/0.61  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.41/0.61  number of clauses in intial UL: 29
% 0.41/0.61  number of clauses initially in problem: 34
% 0.41/0.61  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.41/0.61  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 86
% 0.41/0.61  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.41/0.61  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.41/0.61     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.41/0.61     distinct function count: 3
% 0.41/0.61     distinct constant count: 9
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.76/0.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Model 2 [ 2 0 267 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.57 sec ----> 44 [binary,43.1,17.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.76/0.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  13 [] {+} -a_truth(liar(b))| -a_truth(liar(c))|an_answer(b_and_c_liars).
% 0.76/0.94  14 [] {+} -a_truth(liar(b))| -a_truth(truthteller(c))|an_answer(b_liar_and_c_truthteller).
% 0.76/0.94  15 [] {+} -a_truth(truthteller(b))| -a_truth(liar(c))|an_answer(b_truthteller_and_c_liar).
% 0.76/0.94  16 [] {+} -a_truth(truthteller(b))| -a_truth(truthteller(c))|an_answer(b_and_c_truthtellers).
% 0.76/0.94  17 [] {+} -an_answer(A).
% 0.76/0.94  30 [] {-} a_truth(truthteller(A))|a_truth(liar(A)).
% 0.76/0.94  37 [hyper,30,14,30,unit_del,17] {-} a_truth(liar(c))|a_truth(truthteller(b)).
% 0.76/0.94  40 [hyper,37,13,30,unit_del,17,factor_simp] {-} a_truth(truthteller(b)).
% 0.76/0.94  41 [hyper,37,16,30,unit_del,17,factor_simp] {+} a_truth(liar(c)).
% 0.76/0.94  43 [hyper,41,15,40] {-} an_answer(b_truthteller_and_c_liar).
% 0.76/0.94  44 [binary,43.1,17.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/0.94  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  ============ end of search ============
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  true clauses given           1      (14.3%)
% 0.76/0.94  false clauses given          6
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.76/0.94     3  1         0
% 0.76/0.94     5  0         1
% 0.76/0.94     6  1         0
% 0.76/0.94  tot:  2         1      (33.3% true)
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Model 2 [ 2 0 267 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Process 19037 finished Sat May 28 21:46:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------