TSTP Solution File: PUZ023-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : PUZ023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:20:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 9 unt; 4 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(truthteller_or_liar,axiom,
( a_truth(truthteller(X))
| a_truth(liar(X)) ) ).
cnf(b_and_c_liars,hypothesis,
( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
| ~ a_truth(liar(c))
| an_answer(b_and_c_liars) ) ).
cnf(b_liar_and_c_truthteller,hypothesis,
( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
| ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
| an_answer(b_liar_and_c_truthteller) ) ).
cnf(b_truthteller_and_c_liar,hypothesis,
( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
| ~ a_truth(liar(c))
| an_answer(b_truthteller_and_c_liar) ) ).
cnf(b_and_c_truthtellers,hypothesis,
( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
| ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
| an_answer(b_and_c_truthtellers) ) ).
cnf(prove_there_is_an_answer,negated_conjecture,
~ an_answer(X) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
~ an_answer(b_and_c_liars),
inference(subst,[],[prove_there_is_an_answer:[bind(X,$fot(b_and_c_liars))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
| ~ a_truth(liar(c)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( an_answer(b_and_c_liars) )],[b_and_c_liars,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( a_truth(liar(c))
| a_truth(truthteller(c)) ),
inference(subst,[],[truthteller_or_liar:[bind(X,$fot(c))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
~ an_answer(b_liar_and_c_truthteller),
inference(subst,[],[prove_there_is_an_answer:[bind(X,$fot(b_liar_and_c_truthteller))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
| ~ a_truth(truthteller(c)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( an_answer(b_liar_and_c_truthteller) )],[b_liar_and_c_truthteller,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
| a_truth(liar(c)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(truthteller(c)) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_4]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( a_truth(liar(b))
| a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
inference(subst,[],[truthteller_or_liar:[bind(X,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
~ an_answer(b_truthteller_and_c_liar),
inference(subst,[],[prove_there_is_an_answer:[bind(X,$fot(b_truthteller_and_c_liar))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( ~ a_truth(liar(c))
| ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( an_answer(b_truthteller_and_c_liar) )],[b_truthteller_and_c_liar,refute_0_7]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
( ~ a_truth(liar(c))
| a_truth(liar(b)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(truthteller(b)) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_8]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
~ an_answer(b_and_c_truthtellers),
inference(subst,[],[prove_there_is_an_answer:[bind(X,$fot(b_and_c_truthtellers))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
| ~ a_truth(truthteller(c)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( an_answer(b_and_c_truthtellers) )],[b_and_c_truthtellers,refute_0_10]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
| a_truth(liar(c)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(truthteller(c)) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_11]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
( a_truth(liar(b))
| a_truth(liar(c)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(truthteller(b)) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_12]) ).
cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
a_truth(liar(b)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(liar(c)) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_9]) ).
cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
a_truth(liar(c)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(liar(b)) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_5]) ).
cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
~ a_truth(liar(b)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(liar(c)) )],[refute_0_15,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(liar(b)) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_16]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : PUZ023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat May 28 21:46:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------