TSTP Solution File: PUZ023-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : PUZ023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:54:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.04s 1.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  16 unt;  15 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  32   ~;  24   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   6   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (;   6   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ people > an_answer > a_truth > says > #nlpp > truthteller > liar > one_truthteller > garbage > c > b_truthteller_and_c_liar > b_liar_and_c_truthteller > b_and_c_truthtellers > b_and_c_liars > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(liar,type,
    liar: $i > $i ).

tff(an_answer,type,
    an_answer: $i > $o ).

tff(people,type,
    people: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(b_and_c_truthtellers,type,
    b_and_c_truthtellers: $i ).

tff(b_liar_and_c_truthteller,type,
    b_liar_and_c_truthteller: $i ).

tff(garbage,type,
    garbage: $i ).

tff(b_and_c_liars,type,
    b_and_c_liars: $i ).

tff(b_truthteller_and_c_liar,type,
    b_truthteller_and_c_liar: $i ).

tff(a_truth,type,
    a_truth: $i > $o ).

tff(truthteller,type,
    truthteller: $i > $i ).

tff(says,type,
    says: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(one_truthteller,type,
    one_truthteller: $i ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i ).

tff(f_217,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ an_answer(X),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_200,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
    | an_answer(b_liar_and_c_truthteller) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( a_truth(truthteller(X))
      | a_truth(liar(X)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_214,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
    | an_answer(b_and_c_truthtellers) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_207,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(c))
    | an_answer(b_truthteller_and_c_liar) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_193,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(c))
    | an_answer(b_and_c_liars) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [X_32] : ~ an_answer(X_32),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_217]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ( an_answer(b_liar_and_c_truthteller)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_200]) ).

tff(c_47,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_38]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    ~ a_truth(liar(b)),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_47]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [X_34] :
      ( a_truth(liar(X_34))
      | a_truth(truthteller(X_34)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ( an_answer(b_and_c_truthtellers)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_214]) ).

tff(c_45,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(c))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_42]) ).

tff(c_51,plain,
    ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

tff(c_55,plain,
    a_truth(liar(b)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_51]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_55]) ).

tff(c_61,plain,
    a_truth(truthteller(b)),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ( an_answer(b_truthteller_and_c_liar)
    | ~ a_truth(liar(c))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_207]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(c))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_40]) ).

tff(c_68,plain,
    ~ a_truth(liar(c)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_61,c_46]) ).

tff(c_69,plain,
    ! [X_36] :
      ( a_truth(liar(X_36))
      | a_truth(truthteller(X_36)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ~ a_truth(truthteller(c)),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

tff(c_75,plain,
    a_truth(liar(c)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_60]) ).

tff(c_80,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_75]) ).

tff(c_82,plain,
    a_truth(liar(b)),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_47]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ( an_answer(b_and_c_liars)
    | ~ a_truth(liar(c))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_193]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(c))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_36]) ).

tff(c_85,plain,
    ~ a_truth(liar(c)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_82,c_48]) ).

tff(c_86,plain,
    ! [X_38] :
      ( a_truth(liar(X_38))
      | a_truth(truthteller(X_38)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_81,plain,
    ~ a_truth(truthteller(c)),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_47]) ).

tff(c_92,plain,
    a_truth(liar(c)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_81]) ).

tff(c_97,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_92]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : PUZ023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:51:29 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.04/1.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.04/1.76  
% 3.04/1.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.32/1.79  
% 3.32/1.79  Inference rules
% 3.32/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.32/1.79  #Ref     : 0
% 3.32/1.79  #Sup     : 6
% 3.32/1.79  #Fact    : 0
% 3.32/1.79  #Define  : 0
% 3.32/1.79  #Split   : 2
% 3.32/1.79  #Chain   : 0
% 3.32/1.79  #Close   : 0
% 3.32/1.79  
% 3.32/1.79  Ordering : KBO
% 3.32/1.79  
% 3.32/1.79  Simplification rules
% 3.32/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.32/1.79  #Subsume      : 4
% 3.32/1.79  #Demod        : 2
% 3.32/1.79  #Tautology    : 2
% 3.32/1.79  #SimpNegUnit  : 7
% 3.32/1.79  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.32/1.79  
% 3.32/1.79  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.32/1.79  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.32/1.79  
% 3.32/1.79  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.32/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.32/1.80  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 3.32/1.80  Parsing              : 0.22
% 3.32/1.80  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.32/1.80  Main loop            : 0.24
% 3.32/1.80  Inferencing          : 0.09
% 3.32/1.80  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.32/1.80  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.32/1.80  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.32/1.80  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.32/1.80  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.32/1.80  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.32/1.80  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.32/1.80  Total                : 0.77
% 3.32/1.80  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.32/1.80  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.32/1.80  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.32/1.80  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------