TSTP Solution File: PUZ017-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ017-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:56:03 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6761/PUZ/PUZ017-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 250] [nf = 2] [nu = 84] [ut = 116]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1647] [nf = 40] [nu = 372] [ut = 146]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9770] [nf = 300] [nu = 1739] [ut = 163]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52922] [nf = 1523] [nu = 8492] [ut = 165]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 276722] [nf = 9631] [nu = 42198] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1502336] [nf = 56179] [nu = 219080] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 27 secs [nr = 8347587] [nf = 407240] [nu = 1186489] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 36652934] [nf = 2120335] [nu = 5435497] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 36654416] [nf = 2120373] [nu = 5435855] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 36662790] [nf = 2120665] [nu = 5437298] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 36712241] [nf = 2122109] [nu = 5444606] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 37089437] [nf = 2137214] [nu = 5490288] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 136 secs [nr = 40634798] [nf = 2315680] [nu = 5844997] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 268 secs [nr = 77537805] [nf = 4618390] [nu = 8703282] [ut = 167]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 92927518
% resolvents: 87599937 factors: 5327581
% Number of unit clauses generated: 9682516
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 10.42
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 82 [1] = 34 [2] = 30 [3] = 17
% [4] = 2 [5] = 2
% Total = 167
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 9682516 [2] = 42118725 [3] = 31028972 [4] = 8038718 [5] = 1812091 [6] = 233900
% [7] = 12488 [8] = 108
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hascolor_2 (+)1 (-)11
% [1] hasdrink_2 (+)1 (-)10
% [2] hasgame_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [3] hasperson_2 (+)1 (-)10
% [4] haspet_2 (+)0 (-)2
% [5] left_2 (+)4 (-)23
% [6] nextto_2 (+)8 (-)17
% [7] samecolor_2 (+)2 (-)10
% [8] samedrink_2 (+)2 (-)10
% [9] samegame_2 (+)1 (-)10
% [10] samehouse_2 (+)4 (-)14
% [11] sameperson_2 (+)2 (-)10
% [12] samepet_2 (+)1 (-)10
% ------------------
% Total: (+)27 (-)140
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 167
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 420568141
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 11678356
% Number of successful unifications: 92927518
% Number of unification failures: 307465263
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 395
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 264772100
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 863488957
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 303481
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 8131815
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 107
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 334
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.32
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 77
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 400392781
% ConstructUnitClause() = 8131900
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 9.32 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 309758
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------