TSTP Solution File: PUZ012-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : PUZ012-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 08:49:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 20 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 13 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f53,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f49,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
~ equal_boxes(boxb,boxc),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boxb_not_boxc) ).
fof(f49,plain,
equal_boxes(boxb,boxc),
inference(resolution,[],[f48,f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ contains(X0,apples)
| equal_boxes(boxb,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f7,f17]) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
contains(boxb,apples),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boxb_contains_apples) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ contains(X0,X1)
| ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_boxes(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contains_is_well_defined2) ).
fof(f48,plain,
contains(boxc,apples),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f47,f16]) ).
fof(f16,axiom,
label(boxc,bananas),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boxc_labelled_bananas) ).
fof(f47,plain,
( contains(boxc,apples)
| ~ label(boxc,bananas) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f40,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ contains(X0,X1)
| ~ label(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_is_wrong) ).
fof(f40,plain,
( contains(boxc,bananas)
| contains(boxc,apples) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f39,f22]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( ~ contains(boxa,bananas)
| contains(boxc,apples)
| contains(boxc,bananas) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f18]) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
( ~ contains(boxc,oranges)
| ~ contains(boxa,bananas) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_boxa_contains_bananas_and_boxc_oranges) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0] :
( contains(X0,oranges)
| contains(X0,bananas)
| contains(X0,apples) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',each_box_contains_something) ).
fof(f39,plain,
contains(boxa,bananas),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f35,f11]) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
~ equal_fruits(apples,bananas),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apples_not_bananas) ).
fof(f35,plain,
( contains(boxa,bananas)
| equal_fruits(apples,bananas) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f34,f24]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ contains(boxb,X0)
| equal_fruits(apples,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f6,f17]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ contains(X0,X1)
| ~ contains(X0,X2)
| equal_fruits(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contains_is_well_defined1) ).
fof(f34,plain,
( contains(boxb,bananas)
| contains(boxa,bananas) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f21,f16]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ label(boxc,X0)
| contains(boxa,X0)
| contains(boxb,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f4,f3]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( contains(boxc,X0)
| contains(boxb,X0)
| contains(boxa,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',each_thing_is_in_a_box) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : PUZ012-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:04:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (21392)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21395)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21398)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21393)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21399)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1]
% 0.22/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [3,3]
% 0.22/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1]
% 0.22/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [6]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [1,1]
% 0.22/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1]
% 0.22/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [3,3]
% 0.22/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1]
% 0.22/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [6]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [1,1]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [2,2]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [2,2]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [3]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [3]
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [3,3]
% 0.22/0.38 % (21393)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 TRYING [3,3]
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-21392"
% 0.22/0.38 % (21395)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 % (21399)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (21394)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)Memory used [KB]: 731
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (21396)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)Memory used [KB]: 731
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (21394)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (21396)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)Memory used [KB]: 750
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (21397)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (21392)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------