TSTP Solution File: PUZ001-3 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : PUZ001-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 18 14:10:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.25s 0.44s
% Output   : Model 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : PUZ001-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep  2 18:15:03 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.38  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.16/0.38  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.16/0.38    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.16/0.38    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.16/0.38    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.16/0.38    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.16/0.38    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.16/0.38    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.16/0.38    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.16/0.38    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.16/0.38    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.16/0.38    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.16/0.38    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.25/0.44  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.25/0.44  % SZS output start Model
% 0.25/0.44  tff(tptp_fun__i_val_2_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     tptp_fun__i_val_2: $i)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(charles_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     charles: $i)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(tptp_fun__i_val_0_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     tptp_fun__i_val_0: $i)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(agatha_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     agatha: $i)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(tptp_fun__i_val_1_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     tptp_fun__i_val_1: $i)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(butler_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     butler: $i)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(lives_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     lives: $i > $o)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(richer_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     richer: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(hates_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     hates: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(killed_type, type, (
% 0.25/0.44     killed: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(formula1, axiom,
% 0.25/0.44      charles = $i!val!2).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(formula2, axiom,
% 0.25/0.44      agatha = $i!val!0).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(formula3, axiom,
% 0.25/0.44      butler = $i!val!1).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(formula4, axiom,
% 0.25/0.44      ![X0: $i] : (lives(X0) <=> ((ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0) | (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!1) | (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!2)))).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(formula5, axiom,
% 0.25/0.44      ![X0: $i, X1: $i] : (richer(X0, X1) <=> ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0)))).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(formula6, axiom,
% 0.25/0.44      ![X0: $i, X1: $i] : (hates(X0, X1) <=> (((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0)) | ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!2)) | ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0)) | ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!2))))).
% 0.25/0.44  tff(formula7, axiom,
% 0.25/0.44      ![X0: $i, X1: $i] : (killed(X0, X1) <=> ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!1), $i!val!1, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, $i!val!2)) = $i!val!0)))).
% 0.25/0.44  % SZS output end Model
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------