TSTP Solution File: PUZ001-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : PUZ001-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:25:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.48s
% Output   : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_28)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( hates(butler,X1)
    | ~ hates(agatha,X1) ),
    c_0_12,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    hates(agatha,agatha),
    agatha_hates_agatha,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    hates(agatha,charles),
    agatha_hates_charles,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ hates(X1,agatha)
    | ~ hates(X1,butler)
    | ~ hates(X1,charles) ),
    c_0_13,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    hates(butler,agatha),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    hates(butler,charles),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_16]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( richer(X1,agatha)
    | hates(butler,X1)
    | ~ lives(X1) ),
    c_0_17,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    lives(butler),
    butler,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ hates(butler,butler),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ killed(X1,X2)
    | ~ richer(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_21,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    richer(butler,agatha),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ~ killed(butler,agatha),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ hates(agatha,X1)
    | ~ hates(charles,X1) ),
    c_0_27,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( killed(charles,agatha)
    | killed(agatha,agatha) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( hates(X1,X2)
    | ~ killed(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_30,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ~ hates(agatha,butler),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ~ hates(charles,agatha),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ hates(charles,charles),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_16]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    lives(charles),
    charles,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_38,axiom,
    lives(agatha),
    agatha,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ001-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 10:45:37 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # new_bool_1 with pid 965 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.48  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.48  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with pid 971 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.48  # Result found by G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.48  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting G----_406_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  # No proof found!
% 0.20/0.48  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.20/0.48  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.20/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.20/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.20/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 0.20/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 33
% 0.20/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 13
% 0.20/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.20/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 12
% 0.20/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.20/0.48  # ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.20/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.20/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.20/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.20/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.20/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.20/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.20/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.20/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 392
% 0.20/0.48  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 23
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.48  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.48  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------