TSTP Solution File: PRO014+2 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : PRO014+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:08:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 11.58s 2.41s
% Output : Proof 14.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : PRO014+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 19:36:07 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.62 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.62 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.62 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 3.23/1.12 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.23/1.12 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.23/1.16 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.23/1.16 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.23/1.16 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.23/1.16 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.23/1.16 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 6.52/1.61 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.52/1.63 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 7.75/1.80 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.75/1.84 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.36/1.87 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 9.53/2.06 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.53/2.13 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 11.58/2.40 Prover 3: proved (1753ms)
% 11.58/2.40
% 11.58/2.41 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.58/2.41
% 11.58/2.41 Prover 6: stopped
% 11.58/2.41 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 11.58/2.41 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 12.21/2.41 Prover 5: stopped
% 12.21/2.42 Prover 0: stopped
% 12.21/2.42 Prover 2: stopped
% 12.21/2.43 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 12.21/2.43 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 12.21/2.43 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 12.21/2.48 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 12.79/2.51 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 12.79/2.52 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 12.79/2.52 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 12.79/2.55 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 13.73/2.61 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.84/2.62 Prover 1: Found proof (size 54)
% 13.84/2.62 Prover 1: proved (1985ms)
% 13.84/2.62 Prover 11: stopped
% 13.84/2.62 Prover 4: stopped
% 13.84/2.63 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.84/2.63 Prover 13: stopped
% 13.84/2.64 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.84/2.64 Prover 7: stopped
% 13.84/2.65 Prover 10: stopped
% 13.84/2.67 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.84/2.68 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.84/2.69 Prover 8: stopped
% 13.84/2.69
% 13.84/2.69 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.84/2.69
% 13.84/2.70 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.84/2.70 Assumptions after simplification:
% 13.84/2.70 ---------------------------------
% 13.84/2.70
% 13.84/2.70 (goals)
% 14.32/2.73 $i(tptp1) & $i(tptp2) & $i(tptp3) & $i(tptp0) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ?
% 14.32/2.73 [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) = 0 & arboreal(v0) =
% 14.32/2.73 0 & leaf_occ(v0, v1) = v2 & occurrence_of(v1, tptp0) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) &
% 14.32/2.73 ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (leaf(v4, tptp0) = 0) | ~ (next_subocc(v0,
% 14.32/2.73 v3, tptp0) = 0) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: any]
% 14.32/2.73 : ? [v7: any] : ? [v8: any] : (occurrence_of(v4, tptp1) = v7 &
% 14.32/2.73 occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) = v6 & occurrence_of(v3, tptp3) = v5 &
% 14.32/2.73 min_precedes(v3, v4, tptp0) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7
% 14.32/2.73 = 0) & ~ (v6 = 0))))))
% 14.32/2.73
% 14.32/2.73 (sos)
% 14.32/2.73 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0
% 14.32/2.73 | ~ (min_precedes(v0, v2, v3) = v4) | ~ (min_precedes(v0, v1, v3) = 0) |
% 14.32/2.73 ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) &
% 14.32/2.73 min_precedes(v1, v2, v3) = v5))
% 14.32/2.73
% 14.32/2.73 (sos_04)
% 14.32/2.73 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~
% 14.32/2.73 (next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4:
% 14.32/2.74 int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & min_precedes(v0, v1, v2) = v4) | ? [v4: $i] :
% 14.32/2.74 (min_precedes(v4, v1, v2) = 0 & min_precedes(v0, v4, v2) = 0 & $i(v4))) & !
% 14.32/2.74 [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) = 0) | ~
% 14.32/2.74 $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | (min_precedes(v0, v1, v2) = 0 & ! [v3: $i]
% 14.32/2.74 : ( ~ (min_precedes(v0, v3, v2) = 0) | ~ $i(v3) | ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4
% 14.32/2.74 = 0) & min_precedes(v3, v1, v2) = v4))))
% 14.32/2.74
% 14.32/2.74 (sos_32)
% 14.32/2.74 $i(tptp1) & $i(tptp2) & $i(tptp4) & $i(tptp3) & $i(tptp0) & ! [v0: $i] : !
% 14.32/2.74 [v1: $i] : ( ~ (arboreal(v0) = 0) | ~ (occurrence_of(v1, tptp0) = 0) | ~
% 14.32/2.74 $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any]
% 14.32/2.74 : ? [v6: any] : (leaf(v4, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(v3, v4, tptp0) = 0 &
% 14.32/2.74 next_subocc(v2, v3, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) = 0 &
% 14.32/2.74 occurrence_of(v4, tptp1) = v6 & occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) = v5 &
% 14.32/2.74 occurrence_of(v3, tptp4) = 0 & occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 14.32/2.74 $i(v3) & $i(v2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = 0)) | ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] :
% 14.32/2.74 (subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) = v2 & leaf_occ(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0)
% 14.32/2.74 | v3 = 0)))
% 14.32/2.74
% 14.32/2.74 (function-axioms)
% 14.32/2.75 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 14.32/2.75 [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (next_subocc(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 14.32/2.75 (next_subocc(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 14.32/2.75 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 14.32/2.75 (min_precedes(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (min_precedes(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & !
% 14.32/2.75 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 14.32/2.75 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (atocc(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (atocc(v3, v2) = v0)) & !
% 14.32/2.75 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 14.32/2.75 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subactivity(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (subactivity(v3, v2) =
% 14.32/2.75 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 14.32/2.75 $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (leaf(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (leaf(v3, v2) =
% 14.32/2.75 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 14.32/2.75 $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subactivity_occurrence(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 14.32/2.75 (subactivity_occurrence(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 14.32/2.75 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (root(v3,
% 14.32/2.75 v2) = v1) | ~ (root(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 14.32/2.75 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 14.32/2.75 (precedes(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (precedes(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 14.32/2.75 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 14.32/2.75 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (leaf_occ(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (leaf_occ(v3, v2) = v0)) & !
% 14.32/2.75 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 14.32/2.75 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (occurrence_of(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (occurrence_of(v3, v2)
% 14.32/2.75 = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 14.32/2.75 $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (root_occ(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (root_occ(v3,
% 14.32/2.75 v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :
% 14.32/2.75 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (earlier(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 14.32/2.75 (earlier(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 14.32/2.75 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (activity_occurrence(v2) =
% 14.32/2.75 v1) | ~ (activity_occurrence(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 14.32/2.75 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (activity(v2) = v1) | ~
% 14.32/2.75 (activity(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 14.32/2.75 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (legal(v2) = v1) | ~
% 14.32/2.75 (legal(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool]
% 14.32/2.75 : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (arboreal(v2) = v1) | ~ (arboreal(v2) = v0)) &
% 14.32/2.75 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 14.32/2.75 v0 | ~ (atomic(v2) = v1) | ~ (atomic(v2) = v0))
% 14.32/2.75
% 14.32/2.75 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 14.32/2.75 --------------------------------------------
% 14.32/2.75 sos_01, sos_02, sos_03, sos_05, sos_06, sos_07, sos_08, sos_09, sos_10, sos_11,
% 14.32/2.75 sos_12, sos_13, sos_14, sos_15, sos_16, sos_17, sos_18, sos_19, sos_20, sos_21,
% 14.32/2.75 sos_22, sos_23, sos_24, sos_25, sos_26, sos_27, sos_28, sos_29, sos_30, sos_31,
% 14.32/2.75 sos_33, sos_34, sos_35, sos_36, sos_37, sos_38, sos_39, sos_40, sos_41, sos_42,
% 14.32/2.75 sos_43, sos_44
% 14.32/2.75
% 14.32/2.75 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 14.32/2.75 ---------------------------------
% 14.32/2.75
% 14.32/2.75 Begin of proof
% 14.32/2.75 |
% 14.32/2.75 | ALPHA: (sos_04) implies:
% 14.32/2.75 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (next_subocc(v0, v1, v2)
% 14.32/2.75 | = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | (min_precedes(v0, v1,
% 14.32/2.75 | v2) = 0 & ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (min_precedes(v0, v3, v2) = 0) | ~
% 14.32/2.75 | $i(v3) | ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & min_precedes(v3, v1, v2) =
% 14.32/2.75 | v4))))
% 14.32/2.75 |
% 14.32/2.75 | ALPHA: (sos_32) implies:
% 14.32/2.75 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (arboreal(v0) = 0) | ~
% 14.32/2.75 | (occurrence_of(v1, tptp0) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i]
% 14.32/2.75 | : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: any] : (leaf(v4,
% 14.32/2.75 | tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(v3, v4, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(v2, v3,
% 14.32/2.75 | tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) = 0 & occurrence_of(v4,
% 14.32/2.75 | tptp1) = v6 & occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) = v5 & occurrence_of(v3,
% 14.32/2.75 | tptp4) = 0 & occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) &
% 14.32/2.75 | $i(v2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = 0)) | ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] :
% 14.32/2.75 | (subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) = v2 & leaf_occ(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~
% 14.32/2.75 | (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0)))
% 14.32/2.75 |
% 14.32/2.75 | ALPHA: (goals) implies:
% 14.32/2.75 | (3) $i(tptp0)
% 14.32/2.75 | (4) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) &
% 14.32/2.75 | subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) = 0 & arboreal(v0) = 0 & leaf_occ(v0,
% 14.32/2.75 | v1) = v2 & occurrence_of(v1, tptp0) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ! [v3:
% 14.32/2.76 | $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (leaf(v4, tptp0) = 0) | ~ (next_subocc(v0,
% 14.32/2.76 | v3, tptp0) = 0) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ? [v5: any] : ?
% 14.32/2.76 | [v6: any] : ? [v7: any] : ? [v8: any] : (occurrence_of(v4, tptp1)
% 14.32/2.76 | = v7 & occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) = v6 & occurrence_of(v3, tptp3) =
% 14.32/2.76 | v5 & min_precedes(v3, v4, tptp0) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v5 =
% 14.32/2.76 | 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & ~ (v6 = 0))))))
% 14.32/2.76 |
% 14.32/2.76 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 14.32/2.76 | (5) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 14.32/2.76 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (occurrence_of(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 14.32/2.76 | (occurrence_of(v3, v2) = v0))
% 14.32/2.76 | (6) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 14.32/2.76 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (leaf_occ(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (leaf_occ(v3,
% 14.32/2.76 | v2) = v0))
% 14.32/2.76 | (7) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 14.32/2.76 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subactivity_occurrence(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 14.32/2.76 | (subactivity_occurrence(v3, v2) = v0))
% 14.32/2.76 | (8) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 14.32/2.76 | ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (min_precedes(v4, v3, v2) =
% 14.32/2.76 | v1) | ~ (min_precedes(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 14.32/2.76 |
% 14.32/2.76 | DELTA: instantiating (4) with fresh symbols all_39_0, all_39_1, all_39_2
% 14.32/2.76 | gives:
% 14.32/2.76 | (9) ~ (all_39_0 = 0) & subactivity_occurrence(all_39_2, all_39_1) = 0 &
% 14.32/2.76 | arboreal(all_39_2) = 0 & leaf_occ(all_39_2, all_39_1) = all_39_0 &
% 14.32/2.76 | occurrence_of(all_39_1, tptp0) = 0 & $i(all_39_1) & $i(all_39_2) & !
% 14.32/2.76 | [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (leaf(v1, tptp0) = 0) | ~
% 14.32/2.76 | (next_subocc(all_39_2, v0, tptp0) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 14.32/2.76 | [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: any] :
% 14.32/2.76 | (occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) = v4 & occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) = v3 &
% 14.32/2.76 | occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) = v2 & min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) = v5 &
% 14.32/2.76 | ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 14.32/2.76 |
% 14.32/2.76 | ALPHA: (9) implies:
% 14.32/2.76 | (10) ~ (all_39_0 = 0)
% 14.32/2.76 | (11) $i(all_39_2)
% 14.32/2.76 | (12) $i(all_39_1)
% 14.32/2.76 | (13) occurrence_of(all_39_1, tptp0) = 0
% 14.32/2.76 | (14) leaf_occ(all_39_2, all_39_1) = all_39_0
% 14.32/2.76 | (15) arboreal(all_39_2) = 0
% 14.32/2.76 | (16) subactivity_occurrence(all_39_2, all_39_1) = 0
% 14.32/2.76 | (17) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (leaf(v1, tptp0) = 0) | ~
% 14.32/2.76 | (next_subocc(all_39_2, v0, tptp0) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 14.32/2.76 | [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: any] :
% 14.32/2.76 | (occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) = v4 & occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) = v3 &
% 14.32/2.76 | occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) = v2 & min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) = v5 &
% 14.32/2.76 | ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 14.32/2.76 |
% 14.32/2.76 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_39_2, all_39_1, simplifying with (11),
% 14.32/2.76 | (12), (13), (15) gives:
% 14.32/2.77 | (18) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: any]
% 14.32/2.77 | : (leaf(v2, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(v1, v2, tptp0) = 0 &
% 14.32/2.77 | next_subocc(v0, v1, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(all_39_2, v0, tptp0) =
% 14.32/2.77 | 0 & occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) = v4 & occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) = v3 &
% 14.32/2.77 | occurrence_of(v1, tptp4) = 0 & occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) = 0 & $i(v2)
% 14.32/2.77 | & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0)) | ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any]
% 14.32/2.77 | : (subactivity_occurrence(all_39_2, all_39_1) = v0 &
% 14.32/2.77 | leaf_occ(all_39_2, all_39_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 14.32/2.77 |
% 14.32/2.77 | BETA: splitting (18) gives:
% 14.32/2.77 |
% 14.32/2.77 | Case 1:
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | (19) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: any] : ? [v4:
% 14.32/2.77 | | any] : (leaf(v2, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(v1, v2, tptp0) = 0 &
% 14.32/2.77 | | next_subocc(v0, v1, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(all_39_2, v0, tptp0)
% 14.32/2.77 | | = 0 & occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) = v4 & occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) =
% 14.32/2.77 | | v3 & occurrence_of(v1, tptp4) = 0 & occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) = 0 &
% 14.32/2.77 | | $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0))
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_67_0, all_67_1, all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.77 | | all_67_3, all_67_4 gives:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (20) leaf(all_67_2, tptp0) = 0 & next_subocc(all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0) =
% 14.32/2.77 | | 0 & next_subocc(all_67_4, all_67_3, tptp0) = 0 &
% 14.32/2.77 | | next_subocc(all_39_2, all_67_4, tptp0) = 0 & occurrence_of(all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.77 | | tptp1) = all_67_0 & occurrence_of(all_67_2, tptp2) = all_67_1 &
% 14.32/2.77 | | occurrence_of(all_67_3, tptp4) = 0 & occurrence_of(all_67_4, tptp3)
% 14.32/2.77 | | = 0 & $i(all_67_2) & $i(all_67_3) & $i(all_67_4) & (all_67_0 = 0 |
% 14.32/2.77 | | all_67_1 = 0)
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | ALPHA: (20) implies:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (21) $i(all_67_4)
% 14.32/2.77 | | (22) $i(all_67_3)
% 14.32/2.77 | | (23) $i(all_67_2)
% 14.32/2.77 | | (24) occurrence_of(all_67_4, tptp3) = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | | (25) occurrence_of(all_67_2, tptp2) = all_67_1
% 14.32/2.77 | | (26) occurrence_of(all_67_2, tptp1) = all_67_0
% 14.32/2.77 | | (27) next_subocc(all_39_2, all_67_4, tptp0) = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | | (28) next_subocc(all_67_4, all_67_3, tptp0) = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | | (29) next_subocc(all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0) = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | | (30) leaf(all_67_2, tptp0) = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | | (31) all_67_0 = 0 | all_67_1 = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_67_4, all_67_3, tptp0, simplifying
% 14.32/2.77 | | with (3), (21), (22), (28) gives:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (32) min_precedes(all_67_4, all_67_3, tptp0) = 0 & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 14.32/2.77 | | (min_precedes(all_67_4, v0, tptp0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: int]
% 14.32/2.77 | | : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & min_precedes(v0, all_67_3, tptp0) = v1))
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | ALPHA: (32) implies:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (33) min_precedes(all_67_4, all_67_3, tptp0) = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0, simplifying
% 14.32/2.77 | | with (3), (22), (23), (29) gives:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (34) min_precedes(all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0) = 0 & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 14.32/2.77 | | (min_precedes(all_67_3, v0, tptp0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: int]
% 14.32/2.77 | | : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & min_precedes(v0, all_67_2, tptp0) = v1))
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | ALPHA: (34) implies:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (35) min_precedes(all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0) = 0
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_67_4, all_67_2, simplifying with
% 14.32/2.77 | | (21), (23), (27), (30) gives:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (36) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] :
% 14.32/2.77 | | (occurrence_of(all_67_2, tptp1) = v2 & occurrence_of(all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.77 | | tptp2) = v1 & occurrence_of(all_67_4, tptp3) = v0 &
% 14.32/2.77 | | min_precedes(all_67_4, all_67_2, tptp0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~
% 14.32/2.77 | | (v0 = 0) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & ~ (v1 = 0))))
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbols all_87_0, all_87_1, all_87_2,
% 14.32/2.77 | | all_87_3 gives:
% 14.32/2.77 | | (37) occurrence_of(all_67_2, tptp1) = all_87_1 & occurrence_of(all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.77 | | tptp2) = all_87_2 & occurrence_of(all_67_4, tptp3) = all_87_3 &
% 14.32/2.77 | | min_precedes(all_67_4, all_67_2, tptp0) = all_87_0 & ( ~ (all_87_0 =
% 14.32/2.77 | | 0) | ~ (all_87_3 = 0) | ( ~ (all_87_1 = 0) & ~ (all_87_2 =
% 14.32/2.77 | | 0)))
% 14.32/2.77 | |
% 14.32/2.77 | | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 14.32/2.78 | | (38) min_precedes(all_67_4, all_67_2, tptp0) = all_87_0
% 14.32/2.78 | | (39) occurrence_of(all_67_4, tptp3) = all_87_3
% 14.32/2.78 | | (40) occurrence_of(all_67_2, tptp2) = all_87_2
% 14.32/2.78 | | (41) occurrence_of(all_67_2, tptp1) = all_87_1
% 14.32/2.78 | | (42) ~ (all_87_0 = 0) | ~ (all_87_3 = 0) | ( ~ (all_87_1 = 0) & ~
% 14.32/2.78 | | (all_87_2 = 0))
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with 0, all_87_3, tptp3, all_67_4,
% 14.32/2.78 | | simplifying with (24), (39) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | (43) all_87_3 = 0
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_67_1, all_87_2, tptp2, all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.78 | | simplifying with (25), (40) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | (44) all_87_2 = all_67_1
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_67_0, all_87_1, tptp1, all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.78 | | simplifying with (26), (41) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | (45) all_87_1 = all_67_0
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (sos) with all_67_4, all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0,
% 14.32/2.78 | | all_87_0, simplifying with (3), (21), (22), (23), (33), (38)
% 14.32/2.78 | | gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | (46) all_87_0 = 0 | ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & min_precedes(all_67_3,
% 14.32/2.78 | | all_67_2, tptp0) = v0)
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | BETA: splitting (46) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | Case 1:
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | (47) all_87_0 = 0
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | BETA: splitting (42) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | Case 1:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | (48) ~ (all_87_0 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | REDUCE: (47), (48) imply:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | (49) $false
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | CLOSE: (49) is inconsistent.
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | Case 2:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | (50) ~ (all_87_3 = 0) | ( ~ (all_87_1 = 0) & ~ (all_87_2 = 0))
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | BETA: splitting (50) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | Case 1:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | (51) ~ (all_87_3 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | REDUCE: (43), (51) imply:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | (52) $false
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | CLOSE: (52) is inconsistent.
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | Case 2:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | (53) ~ (all_87_1 = 0) & ~ (all_87_2 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | ALPHA: (53) implies:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | (54) ~ (all_87_2 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | (55) ~ (all_87_1 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | REDUCE: (45), (55) imply:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | (56) ~ (all_67_0 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | REDUCE: (44), (54) imply:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | (57) ~ (all_67_1 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | BETA: splitting (31) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | (58) all_67_0 = 0
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | REDUCE: (56), (58) imply:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | (59) $false
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | CLOSE: (59) is inconsistent.
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | (60) all_67_1 = 0
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | REDUCE: (57), (60) imply:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | (61) $false
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | | CLOSE: (61) is inconsistent.
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | | End of split
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | | End of split
% 14.32/2.78 | | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | End of split
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | Case 2:
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | (62) ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & min_precedes(all_67_3, all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.78 | | | tptp0) = v0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | DELTA: instantiating (62) with fresh symbol all_138_0 gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | (63) ~ (all_138_0 = 0) & min_precedes(all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0) =
% 14.32/2.78 | | | all_138_0
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | ALPHA: (63) implies:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | (64) ~ (all_138_0 = 0)
% 14.32/2.78 | | | (65) min_precedes(all_67_3, all_67_2, tptp0) = all_138_0
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with 0, all_138_0, tptp0, all_67_2,
% 14.32/2.78 | | | all_67_3, simplifying with (35), (65) gives:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | (66) all_138_0 = 0
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | REDUCE: (64), (66) imply:
% 14.32/2.78 | | | (67) $false
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | | CLOSE: (67) is inconsistent.
% 14.32/2.78 | | |
% 14.32/2.78 | | End of split
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.32/2.78 | Case 2:
% 14.32/2.78 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | (68) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : (subactivity_occurrence(all_39_2,
% 14.69/2.79 | | all_39_1) = v0 & leaf_occ(all_39_2, all_39_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 =
% 14.69/2.79 | | 0) | v1 = 0))
% 14.69/2.79 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | DELTA: instantiating (68) with fresh symbols all_67_0, all_67_1 gives:
% 14.69/2.79 | | (69) subactivity_occurrence(all_39_2, all_39_1) = all_67_1 &
% 14.69/2.79 | | leaf_occ(all_39_2, all_39_1) = all_67_0 & ( ~ (all_67_1 = 0) |
% 14.69/2.79 | | all_67_0 = 0)
% 14.69/2.79 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | ALPHA: (69) implies:
% 14.69/2.79 | | (70) leaf_occ(all_39_2, all_39_1) = all_67_0
% 14.69/2.79 | | (71) subactivity_occurrence(all_39_2, all_39_1) = all_67_1
% 14.69/2.79 | | (72) ~ (all_67_1 = 0) | all_67_0 = 0
% 14.69/2.79 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_39_0, all_67_0, all_39_1, all_39_2,
% 14.69/2.79 | | simplifying with (14), (70) gives:
% 14.69/2.79 | | (73) all_67_0 = all_39_0
% 14.69/2.79 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_67_1, all_39_1, all_39_2,
% 14.69/2.79 | | simplifying with (16), (71) gives:
% 14.69/2.79 | | (74) all_67_1 = 0
% 14.69/2.79 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | BETA: splitting (72) gives:
% 14.69/2.79 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | Case 1:
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | | (75) ~ (all_67_1 = 0)
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | | REDUCE: (74), (75) imply:
% 14.69/2.79 | | | (76) $false
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | | CLOSE: (76) is inconsistent.
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | Case 2:
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | | (77) all_67_0 = 0
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | | COMBINE_EQS: (73), (77) imply:
% 14.69/2.79 | | | (78) all_39_0 = 0
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | | REDUCE: (10), (78) imply:
% 14.69/2.79 | | | (79) $false
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | | CLOSE: (79) is inconsistent.
% 14.69/2.79 | | |
% 14.69/2.79 | | End of split
% 14.69/2.79 | |
% 14.69/2.79 | End of split
% 14.69/2.79 |
% 14.69/2.79 End of proof
% 14.69/2.79 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.69/2.79
% 14.69/2.79 2168ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------