TSTP Solution File: PRO013+1 by Refute---2015
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Refute---2015
% Problem : PRO013+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_refute %d %s
% Computer : n006.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Apr 14 02:25:48 EDT 2016
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PRO013+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_refute %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n006.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Wed Apr 6 08:49:24 CDT 2016
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 6.30/5.85 > val it = (): unit
% 6.50/6.08 Trying to find a model that refutes: bnd_occurrence_of X110 bnd_tptp0 -->
% 6.50/6.08 (EX X111 X112.
% 6.50/6.08 (((bnd_occurrence_of X111 bnd_tptp3 & bnd_root_occ X111 X110) &
% 6.50/6.08 (bnd_occurrence_of X112 bnd_tptp2 |
% 6.50/6.08 bnd_occurrence_of X112 bnd_tptp1)) &
% 6.50/6.08 bnd_min_precedes X111 X112 bnd_tptp0) &
% 6.50/6.08 bnd_leaf_occ X112 X110)
% 7.50/7.02 Unfolded term: [| ~ bnd_tptp2 = bnd_tptp1; ~ bnd_tptp3 = bnd_tptp1;
% 7.50/7.02 ~ bnd_tptp3 = bnd_tptp2; ~ bnd_tptp4 = bnd_tptp1;
% 7.50/7.02 ~ bnd_tptp4 = bnd_tptp2; ~ bnd_tptp4 = bnd_tptp3; bnd_atomic bnd_tptp3;
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_atomic bnd_tptp1; bnd_atomic bnd_tptp2; bnd_atomic bnd_tptp4;
% 7.50/7.02 ~ bnd_atomic bnd_tptp0; bnd_activity bnd_tptp0;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X105.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X105 bnd_tptp0 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X106 X107 X108.
% 7.50/7.02 (((((bnd_occurrence_of X106 bnd_tptp3 & bnd_root_occ X106 X105) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X107 bnd_tptp4) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X106 X107 bnd_tptp0) &
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_occurrence_of X108 bnd_tptp2 |
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X108 bnd_tptp1)) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X107 X108 bnd_tptp0) &
% 7.50/7.02 (ALL X109.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X106 X109 bnd_tptp0 -->
% 7.50/7.02 X109 = X107 | X109 = X108));
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X102 X103.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_leaf_occ X102 X103 =
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X104.
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_occurrence_of X103 X104 &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X102 X103) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_leaf X102 X104);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X99 X100.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_root_occ X99 X100 =
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X101.
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_occurrence_of X100 X101 &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X99 X100) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_root X99 X101);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X94 X95 X96 X97.
% 7.50/7.02 ((bnd_occurrence_of X96 X94 & bnd_occurrence_of X97 X95) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity X94 X95) &
% 7.50/7.02 ~ bnd_subactivity_occurrence X96 X97 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X98.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X98 X97 &
% 7.50/7.02 ~ bnd_subactivity_occurrence X98 X96);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X91 X92 X93.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X91 X92 &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X92 X93 -->
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X91 X93;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X87 X88 X89 X90.
% 7.50/7.02 ((bnd_occurrence_of X89 X87 & bnd_occurrence_of X90 X88) &
% 7.50/7.02 ~ bnd_atomic X87) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X89 X90 -->
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity X87 X88;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X83 X84 X85 X86.
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_min_precedes X83 X84 X85 & bnd_occurrence_of X86 X85) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X84 X86 -->
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X83 X86;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X79 X80 X81 X82.
% 7.50/7.02 (((bnd_occurrence_of X80 X79 & bnd_arboreal X81) & bnd_arboreal X82) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X81 X80) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X82 X80 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_min_precedes X81 X82 X79 | bnd_min_precedes X82 X81 X79) |
% 7.50/7.02 X81 = X82;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X76 X77.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X77 X76 & ~ bnd_atomic X76 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X78. bnd_root X78 X76 & bnd_subactivity_occurrence X78 X77);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X73 X74.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_root X74 X73 & ~ bnd_atomic X73 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X75.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X75 X73 & bnd_subactivity_occurrence X74 X75);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X69 X70 X71.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X70 X71 X69 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X72.
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_occurrence_of X72 X69 & bnd_subactivity_occurrence X70 X72) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X71 X72);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X67 X68.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X67 X68 -->
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_activity_occurrence X67 & bnd_activity_occurrence X68;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X64 X65.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_atocc X64 X65 =
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X66.
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_subactivity X65 X66 & bnd_atomic X66) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X64 X66);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X60 X61 X62.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_next_subocc X60 X61 X62 =
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_min_precedes X60 X61 X62 &
% 7.50/7.02 ~ (EX X63.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X60 X63 X62 & bnd_min_precedes X63 X61 X62));
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X56 X57.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_leaf X56 X57 =
% 7.50/7.02 ((bnd_root X56 X57 | (EX X58. bnd_min_precedes X58 X56 X57)) &
% 7.50/7.02 ~ (EX X59. bnd_min_precedes X56 X59 X57));
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X52 X53 X54 X55.
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_min_precedes X53 X52 X55 & bnd_min_precedes X54 X52 X55) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_precedes X53 X54 -->
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X53 X54 X55;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X49 X50 X51. bnd_min_precedes X49 X50 X51 --> ~ bnd_atomic X51;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X45 X46 X47 X48.
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_min_precedes X45 X46 X48 & bnd_min_precedes X45 X47 X48) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_precedes X46 X47 -->
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X46 X47 X48;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X43 X44. bnd_atocc X43 X44 & bnd_legal X43 --> bnd_root X43 X44;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X41 X42. bnd_root X41 X42 --> bnd_legal X41;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X38 X39 X40. bnd_min_precedes X38 X39 X40 --> bnd_precedes X38 X39;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X35 X36 X37. bnd_min_precedes X35 X36 X37 --> ~ bnd_root X36 X37;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X31 X32 X33.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X31 X32 X33 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X34. bnd_root X34 X33 & bnd_min_precedes X34 X32 X33);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X28 X29.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_root X29 X28 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X30. bnd_subactivity X30 X28 & bnd_atocc X29 X30);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X23 X24 X25.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X24 X25 X23 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X26 X27.
% 7.50/7.02 ((bnd_subactivity X26 X23 & bnd_subactivity X27 X23) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_atocc X24 X26) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_atocc X25 X27);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X21 X22.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_precedes X21 X22 = (bnd_earlier X21 X22 & bnd_legal X22);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X19 X20. bnd_legal X19 & bnd_earlier X20 X19 --> bnd_legal X20;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X18. bnd_legal X18 --> bnd_arboreal X18;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X16 X17.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X16 X17 --> bnd_arboreal X16 = bnd_atomic X17;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X13 X14 X15.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_earlier X13 X14 & bnd_earlier X15 X14 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_earlier X15 X13 | bnd_earlier X13 X15) | X13 = X15;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X10 X11 X12.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_earlier X10 X11 & bnd_earlier X11 X12 --> bnd_earlier X10 X12;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X8 X9. bnd_earlier X8 X9 --> ~ bnd_earlier X9 X8;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X7. bnd_activity X7 --> bnd_subactivity X7 X7;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X4 X5 X6.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X4 X5 & bnd_occurrence_of X4 X6 --> X5 = X6;
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X2.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_activity_occurrence X2 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X3. bnd_activity X3 & bnd_occurrence_of X2 X3);
% 7.50/7.02 ALL X0 X1.
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X1 X0 -->
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_activity X0 & bnd_activity_occurrence X1 |]
% 7.50/7.02 ==> bnd_occurrence_of X110 bnd_tptp0 -->
% 7.50/7.02 (EX X111 X112.
% 7.50/7.02 (((bnd_occurrence_of X111 bnd_tptp3 & bnd_root_occ X111 X110) &
% 7.50/7.02 (bnd_occurrence_of X112 bnd_tptp2 |
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_occurrence_of X112 bnd_tptp1)) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_min_precedes X111 X112 bnd_tptp0) &
% 7.50/7.02 bnd_leaf_occ X112 X110)
% 7.50/7.02 Adding axioms...
% 7.50/7.03 Typedef.type_definition_def
% 12.91/12.42 ...done.
% 12.91/12.42 Ground types: ?'b, TPTP_Interpret.ind
% 12.91/12.42 Translating term (sizes: 1, 1) ...
% 16.71/16.26 Invoking SAT solver...
% 16.71/16.26 No model exists.
% 16.71/16.26 Translating term (sizes: 2, 1) ...
% 21.22/20.72 Invoking SAT solver...
% 21.22/20.72 No model exists.
% 21.22/20.72 Translating term (sizes: 1, 2) ...
% 48.38/47.80 Invoking SAT solver...
% 48.38/47.80 No model exists.
% 48.38/47.80 Translating term (sizes: 3, 1) ...
% 55.20/54.63 Invoking SAT solver...
% 55.20/54.63 No model exists.
% 55.20/54.63 Translating term (sizes: 2, 2) ...
% 89.88/89.26 Invoking SAT solver...
% 89.88/89.26 No model exists.
% 89.88/89.26 Translating term (sizes: 1, 3) ...
% 212.22/211.00 Invoking SAT solver...
% 212.22/211.10 No model exists.
% 212.22/211.10 Translating term (sizes: 4, 1) ...
% 226.31/225.01 Invoking SAT solver...
% 226.31/225.01 No model exists.
% 226.31/225.01 Translating term (sizes: 3, 2) ...
% 300.01/298.13 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/lib/scripts/run-polyml-5.5.2: line 82: 43702 CPU time limit exceeded (core dumped) "$ISABELLE_HOME/lib/scripts/feeder" -p -h "$MLTEXT" -t "$MLEXIT" $FEEDER_OPTS
% 300.01/298.13 43703 (core dumped) | { read FPID; "$POLY" -q -i $ML_OPTIONS; RC="$?"; kill -TERM "$FPID"; exit "$RC"; }
% 300.01/298.14 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/src/HOL/TPTP/lib/Tools/tptp_refute: line 26: 43648 Exit 152 "$ISABELLE_PROCESS" -q -e "use_thy \"/tmp/$SCRATCH\"; exit 1;" HOL-TPTP
% 300.01/298.14 43649 CPU time limit exceeded (core dumped) | grep --line-buffered -v "^###\|^PROOF FAILED for depth\|^Failure node\|inferences so far. Searching to depth\|^val \|^Loading theory\|^Warning-The type of\|^ monotype.$"
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------